<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Climate Action &#187; carbon dioxide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/tag/carbon-dioxide/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org</link>
	<description>US Climate Action Network&#039;s Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:12:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Greenways Can Take Us Where We Want to Go</title>
		<link>http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/energy-rebellion/greenways-can-take-us-where-we-want-to-go/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/energy-rebellion/greenways-can-take-us-where-we-want-to-go/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Suzanne Bopp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy Rebellion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bicycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pedestrian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/?p=700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Improvements in bicycling and pedestrian infrastructure, such as greenways, could have a major impact in lowering emissions, achieving at least half of President Obama’s 2020 goal and saving money too, according to an article on Sustainable Energy Transition. Transportation accounts for about 28% of US greenhouse gas emissions. A recent study showed that only about [...]
No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Improvements in bicycling and pedestrian infrastructure, such as greenways, could have a major impact in lowering emissions, achieving at least half of President Obama’s 2020 goal and saving money too, according to an article on <a href="http://setenergy.org/2009/12/14/greenways-can-achieve-most-of-2020-us-climate-goal/#more-1448">Sustainable Energy Transition</a>. <img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-699" title="IMG_0419-300x225" src="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/IMG_0419-300x225-150x150.jpg" alt="IMG_0419-300x225" width="150" height="150" /></p>
<p>Transportation accounts for about 28% of US greenhouse gas emissions. A recent study showed that only about 12% of Americans use active transportation regularly (9% walk, 1% bike and 2% take the bus or train). By increasing the bicycling and walking numbers by just 12.5% annually over the next decade, we would reach an active transportation share of more than 36% in 2020. That would mean a greater than 5% drop in total US emissions – equal to at least half of the 10% reduction below current levels that has been proposed as a target (and 17% below 2005 levels).</p>
<p>The article points to the <a href="http://greenway.org">East Coast Greenway, </a> a developing trail system 3,000 miles long, as an example of the type of infrastructure needed to make that goal possible and reminds readers that countries such as The Netherlands and Sweden already have 50-65% active transportation shares – 36% here should certainly be possible.</p>
<p>- Suzanne Bopp</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.usclimatenetwork.org%2Fenergy-rebellion%2Fgreenways-can-take-us-where-we-want-to-go%2F&amp;title=Greenways%20Can%20Take%20Us%20Where%20We%20Want%20to%20Go" id="wpa2a_2"><img src="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p><p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/energy-rebellion/greenways-can-take-us-where-we-want-to-go/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EPA Presses Case to Regulate Greenhouse Emissions</title>
		<link>http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/energy-rebellion/epa-presses-case-to-regulate-greenhouse-emissions/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/energy-rebellion/epa-presses-case-to-regulate-greenhouse-emissions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Suzanne Bopp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy Rebellion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sulfur]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/?p=294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week, the EPA is holding public hearings in Arlington, Va., and Chicago on the agency&#8217;s proposal to begin regulating global warming gases from power plants, oil refineries, factories and other major sources, under the authority of the Clean Air Act. The current Clean Air Act regulations for such pollutants as lead, sulfur dioxide, and [...]
Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/energy-rebellion/epa-says-greenhouse-gases-are-dangerous-can-be-regulated/' rel='bookmark' title='EPA Says Greenhouse Gases Are Dangerous, Can Be Regulated'>EPA Says Greenhouse Gases Are Dangerous, Can Be Regulated</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/energy-rebellion/the-u-s-chamber-of-commerce-asks-court-to-block-epa-from-regulating-emissions/' rel='bookmark' title='The U.S. Chamber of Commerce Asks Court to Block EPA from Regulating Emissions'>The U.S. Chamber of Commerce Asks Court to Block EPA from Regulating Emissions</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hotline/the-case-for-clean-energy-and-clean-air-climate-action-hotline-10-17-11/' rel='bookmark' title='The Case for Clean Energy and Clean Air, Climate Action Hotline 10.17.11'>The Case for Clean Energy and Clean Air, Climate Action Hotline 10.17.11</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week, the EPA is holding public hearings in Arlington, Va., and Chicago on the agency&#8217;s proposal to begin regulating global warming gases from power plants, oil refineries, factories and other major sources, under the authority of the Clean Air Act. <img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-295" title="epa" src="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/epa-150x150.jpg" alt="epa" width="150" height="150" /></p>
<p>The current Clean Air Act regulations for such pollutants as lead, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen oxides apply to facilities that emit 100 to 250 tons annually. That threshold is inappropriate for the six global warming gases EPA has authority to regulate (carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons and sulfur hexafluoride). Under the EPA’s proposed “tailoring” rule, facilities that emit at least 25,000 tons of greenhouse gases a year would have to obtain permits. This program would cover nearly 70 percent of the nation’s total greenhouse gas emissions from stationary sources. Small farms, restaurants and other small facilities wouldn’t be affected under the new rule.</p>
<p>The EPA will accept written comments on the proposed rule until December 28, 2009.</p>
<p>&#8211; Suzanne Bopp</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.usclimatenetwork.org%2Fenergy-rebellion%2Fepa-presses-case-to-regulate-greenhouse-emissions%2F&amp;title=EPA%20Presses%20Case%20to%20Regulate%20Greenhouse%20Emissions" id="wpa2a_4"><img src="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p><p>Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/energy-rebellion/epa-says-greenhouse-gases-are-dangerous-can-be-regulated/' rel='bookmark' title='EPA Says Greenhouse Gases Are Dangerous, Can Be Regulated'>EPA Says Greenhouse Gases Are Dangerous, Can Be Regulated</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/energy-rebellion/the-u-s-chamber-of-commerce-asks-court-to-block-epa-from-regulating-emissions/' rel='bookmark' title='The U.S. Chamber of Commerce Asks Court to Block EPA from Regulating Emissions'>The U.S. Chamber of Commerce Asks Court to Block EPA from Regulating Emissions</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hotline/the-case-for-clean-energy-and-clean-air-climate-action-hotline-10-17-11/' rel='bookmark' title='The Case for Clean Energy and Clean Air, Climate Action Hotline 10.17.11'>The Case for Clean Energy and Clean Air, Climate Action Hotline 10.17.11</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/energy-rebellion/epa-presses-case-to-regulate-greenhouse-emissions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

