<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Climate Action &#187; climate denier</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/tag/climate-denier/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org</link>
	<description>US Climate Action Network&#039;s Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:12:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Cues from Our Climate and Other Hot Pubs</title>
		<link>http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hot-pubs/cues-from-our-climate-and-other-hot-pubs/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hot-pubs/cues-from-our-climate-and-other-hot-pubs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>USCAN</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hot Pubs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate denier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone XL Pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weather]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/?p=3048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Member Reports: Insurer Responses to Climate Risk: This month, Ceres released “Climate Risk Disclosure By Insurers: Evaluating Insurer Responses to the NAIC Climate Disclosure Survey.” The report examines public disclosure filings from the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) to assess US insurer consideration of climate change as a key risk factor to their business [...]
Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hot-pubs/broad-support-for-a-strong-epa-and-other-hot-pubs/' rel='bookmark' title='Broad Support for a Strong EPA and Other Hot Pubs'>Broad Support for a Strong EPA and Other Hot Pubs</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hot-pubs/cause-and-effect-and-other-hot-pubs/' rel='bookmark' title='Cause and Effect and Other Hot Pubs'>Cause and Effect and Other Hot Pubs</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hot-pubs/cleaning-up-our-waters-spending-and-energy-use-hot-pubs/' rel='bookmark' title='Cleaning Up Our Waters, Spending, and Energy Use Hot Pubs'>Cleaning Up Our Waters, Spending, and Energy Use Hot Pubs</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Member Reports:</strong></p>
<p><strong>Insurer Responses to Climate Risk:</strong> This month, Ceres released “Climate Risk Disclosure By Insurers: Evaluating Insurer Responses to the NAIC Climate Disclosure Survey.” The <a href="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/resource-database/report-climate-risk-disclosure-by-insurers/">report</a> examines public disclosure filings from the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) to assess US insurer consideration of climate change as a key risk factor to their business and how that consideration affects their decision making. Based on the NAIC <img class="alignright" title="Flooded Bench" src="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/bench-underwater.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="199" />responses, which targeted six states, Ceres’ <a href="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/resource-database/report-climate-risk-disclosure-by-insurers/">analysis</a> found that there does exist a “broad consensus among insurers that climate change will have an effect on extreme weather events, [with] more than three-quarters of insurers [citing] perils that may be affected by climate change. Despite this recognition, out of 88 companies surveyed, “only 11 insurers reported having formal climate change policies, and more than 60 percent of the respondents reported having no dedicated management approach for assessing climate risk.” Of 18 property and casualty companies surveyed, none had “formal climate change policies or explicit board or executive oversight of this issue.”</p>
<p><strong>Climate Financing and Gender Equality</strong>: Oxfam America, along with Gender Action and the Women’s Environment and Development Organization released a research <a href="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/resource-database/report-governing-climate-funds-what-will-work-for-women">report</a> this month examining practices that would ensure equal and effective distribution of climate change financing for the world’s most vulnerable populations. “Governing Climate Funds: What Will Work for Women?” urges that if climate funds are to respond effectively, “they must incorporate gender throughout project planning, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation.” The <a href="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/resource-database/report-governing-climate-funds-what-will-work-for-women">study</a> looks at four funds, two climate and two non-climate funds, to find useful strategies for gender integration in global finance mechanisms. Among several recommendations made in the report, it finds that “climate funds should [not only] allow recipient countries to access finance directly…but should also strengthen mandatory gender project review criteria and gender evaluation requirements [as well as] allow and encourage women’s groups to apply for finance directly when national implementing agencies are not meeting their needs.”</p>
<p><strong>Exposing Keystone XL:</strong> This month OilChange International released “Exposing Energy Security: Keystone XL Exposed.” The <a href="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/resource-database/report-exposing-energy-security-keystone-xl-exposed">briefing</a> targets claims made by major industry that the Keystone pipeline is necessary to ensure America’s energy security and will work to reduce the country’s dependence on foreign oil, scrutinizing the global oil market and the oil companies that stand to profit from the pipeline. Based on facts uncovered in the <a href="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/resource-database/report-exposing-energy-security-keystone-xl-exposed">report</a>, OilChange posits that Keystone XL “will feed the growing trend of exporting refined products out of the United States, thereby doing nothing to enhance energy security or to stabilize oil prices or gasoline prices at the pump.” It uncovers a business model put forth by Valero that “seeks to export products made with imported oil while further importing gasoline from a third country.”</p>
<p><strong>Nonmember Reports:</strong></p>
<p><strong>Extreme Weather:</strong> This month Climate Communications released “Current Extreme Weather and Climate Change,” summarizing the latest research on the connection between climate change and extreme weather. The <a href="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/resource-database/report-current-extreme-weather-and-climate-change">report</a>, reviewed by several leading climatologists, found that extreme weather events, such as heat waves, droughts, flooding, and hurricanes, are happening more frequently, and that the ties to human-induced climate change are clear. In-depth analyses have demonstrated that natural climate variability cannot solely explain the long-term trends of changing weather extremes, especially in terms of increased heat waves. The <a href="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/resource-database/report-current-extreme-weather-and-climate-change">research</a> indicates that “the increased in hot weather is a direct result of climate change, and human influence is estimated to have more than doubled the likelihood of the warming trends experienced recently in virtually every region of the globe.”</p>
<p><strong>The Facts on Keystone’s Job Potential:</strong> The Cornell Global Labor Institute recently released its analysis of the job impacts expected from construction of the Keystone XL pipeline. It finds that estimations of the pipeline’s job-creating potential made by the American Petroleum Institute are unreliable and “therefore unsuitable for public debate.” Citing previous and potential future oil spills, emissions levels, and air quality, the release states that the Keystone project has “minimal job creation potential, but maximum potential in terms of the environmental damage it could cause.” The findings urge that “the U.S. needs a real jobs program [and] Keystone XL is not it.” Further information about the Cornell findings regarding the pipeline jobs can be found on the USCAN Tar Sands <a href="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/tar-sands">webpage</a>.</p>
<p><strong>GHG Emissions from Natural Gas Extraction:</strong> A <a href="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/resource-database/report-methane-and-the-greenhouse-gas-footprint-of-natural-gas-from-shale-formations">study</a> released by the Cornell Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology earlier this year examined the GHG emissions released during high-volume hydraulic shale fracturing to obtain natural gas. The research found that methane emissions during this process are “at least 30% more than and perhaps more than twice as great as those from conventional gas.”  The majority of the GHG footprint for shale comes from direct CO2 emissions during consumption, but also from methane emissions that are not collected and piped away during natural gas extraction processes. According to the <a href="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/resource-database/report-methane-and-the-greenhouse-gas-footprint-of-natural-gas-from-shale-formations">study</a>, when compared to coal, the “footprint of shale gas is at least 20% greater and perhaps more than twice as great on the 20-year horizon.”</p>
<p><strong>Natural Gas vs. Coal:</strong> A <a href="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/resource-database/report-coal-to-gas-the-influence-of-methane-leakage">study</a> released last month by the National Center for Atmospheric Research, “Coal to Gas: The Influence of Methane Leakage” found that although the burning of natural gas emits significantly less carbon dioxide than coal, a greater reliance on it would not significantly slow down climate change. Research by Tom Wigley, a senior research associate at NCAR found that “when gas replaces coal there is additional warming out to [the year] 2050,” assuming methane leakage during natural gas extraction is kept at 0%, “and out to [the year] 2,140 if the leakage rate is as high as 10%.” The <a href="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/resource-database/report-coal-to-gas-the-influence-of-methane-leakage">study</a> finds that fracking specifically is associated with an increase in methane leakage compared to other means of gas production, and that “the direct effects on global-mean temperature of differential gas leakage between coal and gas production are very small.”</p>
<p><strong>Surveys and Polls:</strong></p>
<p><strong>Political Party and Climate Belief</strong>: The Yale Project on Climate Change Communications and the George Mason University Center for Climate Change Communications released a <a href="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/resource-database/poll-politics-global-warming-democrats-republicans-independents-and-the-tea-party">report</a> detailing the results from their most recent national survey of the American public. “Politics &amp; Global Warming: Democrats, Republicans, Independents, and the Tea Party” examines responses by members of each political party related to the issue of global warming. The <a href="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/resource-database/poll-politics-global-warming-democrats-republicans-independents-and-the-tea-party">results</a> indicated that 78% of Democrats, 71% of Independents, and 53% of Republicans believe that global warming is happening, compared with only 34% of Tea Party members. 53% of Tea Party members, in fact, responded that they believe global warming is <em>not</em> happening. The majorities of all four parties support expanding offshore drilling for oil and natural gas off the U.S. coast, “with 46% of Republicans and 58% of Tea Party members strongly supportive.”</p>
<p><strong>EPA Sentiments:</strong> A September national Bloomberg poll, based on interviews with 997 U.S. adults 18 and older found that sixty-six percent of respondents reported being “less likely to vote for someone who wants to abolish the Environmental Protection Agency, versus 19 percent who said the opposite.” For more survey results regarding respondents feelings on the Presidential campaign and current political affairs, view the Bloomberg <a href="http://media.bloomberg.com/bb/avfile/rE6BuEG98dFM">polling data</a>.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.usclimatenetwork.org%2Fhot-pubs%2Fcues-from-our-climate-and-other-hot-pubs%2F&amp;title=Cues%20from%20Our%20Climate%20and%20Other%20Hot%20Pubs" id="wpa2a_2"><img src="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p><p>Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hot-pubs/broad-support-for-a-strong-epa-and-other-hot-pubs/' rel='bookmark' title='Broad Support for a Strong EPA and Other Hot Pubs'>Broad Support for a Strong EPA and Other Hot Pubs</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hot-pubs/cause-and-effect-and-other-hot-pubs/' rel='bookmark' title='Cause and Effect and Other Hot Pubs'>Cause and Effect and Other Hot Pubs</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hot-pubs/cleaning-up-our-waters-spending-and-energy-use-hot-pubs/' rel='bookmark' title='Cleaning Up Our Waters, Spending, and Energy Use Hot Pubs'>Cleaning Up Our Waters, Spending, and Energy Use Hot Pubs</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hot-pubs/cues-from-our-climate-and-other-hot-pubs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Toss another skeptic on the barbie….,Climate Action Hotline, 7.5.11</title>
		<link>http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hotline/toss-another-skeptic-on-the-barbie%e2%80%a6-climate-action-hotline-7-5-11/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hotline/toss-another-skeptic-on-the-barbie%e2%80%a6-climate-action-hotline-7-5-11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 17:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>USCAN</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hotline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aviation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate denier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/?p=2845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter Bahouth, Executive Director July 5, 2011 Toss another skeptic on the barbie…. If, over the course of July 4th festivities, someone brought up your work, you may have experienced the demoralizing feeling that one can get from talking with the neighbors about the future of the planet. Over the past few years, we have [...]
Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hotline/global-business-leaders-push-for-more-action-on-climate-change-climate-action-hotline-10-24-11/' rel='bookmark' title='Global Business Leaders Push for More Action on Climate Change, Climate Action Hotline 10.24.11'>Global Business Leaders Push for More Action on Climate Change, Climate Action Hotline 10.24.11</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hotline/climate-action-hotline-3-21-11/' rel='bookmark' title='Climate Action Hotline, 3.21.11'>Climate Action Hotline, 3.21.11</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hotline/2485/' rel='bookmark' title='Imagine a World Where Politicians Get it About Climate, Climate Action Hotline 3.7.11'>Imagine a World Where Politicians Get it About Climate, Climate Action Hotline 3.7.11</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="741" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="emailcontainer" style="border: 8px solid #2C6A9C;padding-top: 0px;padding-right: 0px;padding-bottom: 0px;padding-left: 0px;" width="757" valign="top">
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="741">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="emailheader" style="padding:0;" colspan="2"><a href="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/category/hotline/"><img src="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/images/email/ca_email_header.jpg" border="0" alt="US Climate Action Network" width="741" height="85" /></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="495" valign="top">
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="feature" style="padding:10px;text-align: left;background-color: #96C3DA;line-height: 16px;" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Peter Bahouth, Executive Director</strong></p>
<p><strong>July 5, 2011 </strong></p>
<table border="0" align="right">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<table border="0" align="right">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><img src="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/fireworksdc1.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="191" height="158" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong>Toss another skeptic on the barbie….</strong></p>
<p>If, over the course of July 4th festivities, someone brought up your work, you may have experienced the demoralizing feeling that one can get from talking with the neighbors about the future of the planet.</p>
<p>Over the past few years, we have become all too familiar with the bizarre trend of public opinion on climate change.  Despite the cascade of ever more certain science, the public is less likely to believe in global warming than it was just five years ago, a time when climate reports were far less terrifying then they are now. The Yale University Project on Climate Change Communication, delved into this in a recent poll. They not only asked citizens what they thought of climate change, they also asked them about how climate scientists felt about global warming.  Only 15 percent of Americans chose the correct answer, which is that about 97 percent of American scientists say that climate change is happening and is mainly caused by human activities. The public is largely unaware of the consensus because that&#8217;s not what they&#8217;re hearing on cable TV or reading in blogs. They mostly get exposed to a much more conflicted view&#8211;and that&#8217;s of course not accidental.</p>
<p>Last week, Greenpeace continued its excellent work exposing the climate deniers by releasing evidence that Willie Soon, a U.S. a climate change skeptic who has also discounted the health risks of mercury emissions from coal, has received more than $1 million in funding in recent years from large energy companies and an oil industry group.</p>
<p>In 1998, API, ExxonMobil and Southern Company met with other oil companies and think tanks where they plotted and funded a Global Climate Science Communications Plan to undermine the climate science and support for the Kyoto Protocol that had just been agreed upon.  &#8220;Victory will be achieved when&#8230; average citizens &#8216;understand&#8217; (recognize) uncertainties in climate science.&#8221; &#8220;Uncertainty&#8221; was also their objective for the media.  The leaked document detailed funding sources from corporate purses going to think tanks and front groups to news sources and outlets with messages counter to the rising consensus on the global warming crisis.</p>
<p>There is also a disconnect between public trust in climate scientists, versus what polls show the public believes. Just last week, NOAA published a major report confirming that the Earth&#8217;s temperature last year matched the warmest readings on record with impacts cascading around the world to affect glaciers, polar ice sheets, vegetation, food production and more. The report highlights 41 global indicators that together narrate the Earth&#8217;s climate story in numbers. Greenhouse gas concentrations are rising, scores of glaciers are shrinking, lake temperatures are going up and river flows are heavier. 75% of Americans said they trust the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and scientists broadly as sources of information on the issue, yet only 40% are alarmed or concerned about climate change.</p>
<p>There is real hope that as organizations continue the hard work of exposing corporate financing of campaigns to manipulate science and the media, the climate deniers will feel the effects of the real “climategate” and public opinion will begin to swing back to help support real change in policy.  Until then, we’ll need to be patient with the neighbors.</p>
<p>Lastly, on behalf of the staff and our board we want to express our best wishes for Angela Anderson. We wish her every success in her new post as the Director of the Climate and Energy program for the Union of Concerned Scientists. Angela, thank you for everything you’ve done. We have absolutely loved working with you and we are so happy you are not leaving us, just leaving USCAN.</p>
<p>Peter Bahouth, Executive Director</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="lsidebar" style="background-color: #FFFFFF; padding: 10px;" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><img src="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/images/email/ca_email_actionalert.gif" alt="Action Alert" width="475" height="32" /></p>
<p><strong>What’s your number? Urge AEP to Stop Lobbying Against Life-Saving Pollution Standards</strong></p>
<p>As Americans across the country rally in support of the EPA’s proposed Mercury and Air Toxics rule, one of America’s largest emitters of toxic air pollution, the American Eclectic Power company (AEP) has spent tens of millions to lobby Congress, including writing an outrageous 56-page draft legislation, attempting to gut these life-saving clean air standards.  Noting that these standards would prevent up to 34,000 premature deaths in the first two years alone, environmental groups have rallied to ask AEP and other polluting industries a simple, question: <strong>What&#8217;s your number?</strong></p>
<p>This last week <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UkLyv6hujk8&amp;feature=relmfu" target="_blank">ads</a> went up across Ohio and supporters have  been rallying outside of AEP’s Columbus based headquarters, highlighting the  number of lives  they want Congress to sacrifice in order to give themselves and other polluters  their desired delays and rollbacks on national toxic air pollution limits.  Join them.</p>
<p>See sample alert from the <a href="https://secure2.edf.org/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&amp;page=UserAction&amp;id=1829&amp;link=fredcol" target="_blank">Environmental  Defense Fund</a> or email <a onclick="return rcmail.command('compose','mdixon@climatenetwork.org',this)" href="mailto:mdixon@climatenetwork.org">mdixon@climatenetwork.org</a> for more information.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="lsidebar" style="background-color: #FFFFFF; padding: 10px;" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><span class="lsidebar" style="background-color: #FFFFFF; padding: 10px;"><img src="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/eesi.jpg" alt="EESI" width="475" height="105" /></span></p>
<h3>Carol Werner, Executive Director</p>
<p>July 5, 2011</h3>
<h3>News</h3>
<ul>
<li><a class="anchor-link" href="#1">Scientific American Series Links Stronger Storms to Climate Change</a></li>
<li><a class="anchor-link" href="#2">California Delays Start of Cap and Trade Program</a></li>
<li><a class="anchor-link" href="#3">Lawsuit Aims to Remove New York from Regional Cap and Trade Program</a></li>
<li><a class="anchor-link" href="#4">Insurers Study Climate Change to Decide Rate Hikes in Alabama</a></li>
<li><a class="anchor-link" href="#5">EPA Report Outlines Climate Adaptation Options for Coastline</a></li>
<li><a class="anchor-link" href="#6">African Women Left Out of Climate Projects, Experts Say</a></li>
<li><a class="anchor-link" href="#7">Rising Waters Swamp West African Nation’s Capital</a></li>
<li><a class="anchor-link" href="#8">Research Partnership to Tackle Food and Climate Challenges </a></li>
<li><a class="anchor-link" href="#9">Study: California Wineries at Risk from Rising Temperatures</a></li>
<li><a class="anchor-link" href="#10">Near-Record Global Temperatures Recorded in 2010</a></li>
<li><a class="anchor-link" href="#11">Rockies Losing Colorful Flowers as Temperatures Rise, Study Finds</a></li>
<li><a class="anchor-link" href="#12">Climate Change to Decrease Salinity of Baltic Sea, Scientists Say</a></li>
<li><a class="anchor-link" href="#13">Researchers Find Droughts Make Water Pollutants More Toxic</a></li>
<li><a class="anchor-link" href="#20">Other Headlines</a></li>
</ul>
<h3>Federal Legislative Action</h3>
<ul>
<li><a class="anchor-link" href="#15">S.1292</a></li>
</ul>
<h3>Events</h3>
<ul>
<li><a class="anchor-link" href="#16">July 15: Electric Transmission 205: Economic Stimulus and Jobs Benefits</a></li>
<li><a class="anchor-link" href="#17">July 21: Cool Roofs for Cooler Summers</a></li>
</ul>
<table border="1" cellspacing="2" width="471">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="461"><strong><a name="1">Scientific American Series Links Stronger Storms to Climate Change</a></strong></p>
<p align="left"><em>Scientific American</em> last week published a three-part series exploring the connection between climate change and extreme weather. The first story stated that the extreme weather predicted by climate models is now being observed across the globe. The second explained how rising global temperatures fuel stronger storms. And the third discussed how the world can manage the risks and adapt to a changing climate. The series was funded by the Pew Center on Global Climate Change. <em>Scientific American</em> had complete editorial control.</p>
<p align="center">For additional information see: <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=extreme-weather-caused-by-climate-change" target="_blank">Part 1</a>, <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=global-warming-and-the-science-of-extreme-weather" target="_blank">Part 2</a>, <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=extreme-future-predicting-coping-with-the-effects-of-a-changing-climate" target="_blank">Part 3</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="461"><strong><a name="2">California Delays Start of Cap and Trade Program</a></strong></p>
<p align="left">California will delay by one year the start of its cap and trade program, officials announced June 29. Mary Nichols, chair of the California Air Resources Board, said the delay is needed for “all necessary elements to be in place and fully functional.” The delay extends the program’s compliance deadline to January 2013. It would apply to the 500 largest sources of carbon dioxide emissions in the state, such as power plants, factories and other industrial facilities. She said the delay will not affect the amount of greenhouse gases industries will be required to cut by the end of the decade. Work on the program slowed as state regulators responded to legal challenges. A state appellate court is still weighing a lower court’s ruling that state regulators did not adequately analyze alternative ways of reducing greenhouse gases. It may take more than a year for the appeals court to issue its ruling. Meanwhile, the state is drafting an analysis.</p>
<p align="center">For additional information see: <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/greenspace/2011/06/california-cap-and-trade.html" target="_blank">Los Angeles Times</a>, <a href="http://www.fresnobee.com/2011/06/27/2443426/court-says-state-can-go-ahead.html" target="_blank">Fresno Bee</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="461"><strong><a name="3">Lawsuit Aims to Remove New York from Regional Cap and Trade Program</a></strong></p>
<p align="left">An activist conservative organization is suing to force New York to drop out of a regional cap and trade program. Americans for Prosperity, which receives significant funding from oil interests, filed the lawsuit June 28. The organization claims the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) imposes an illegal tax on New Yorkers because former Governor George Pataki, a Republican, entered the program without approval from the state legislature. The 10-state program limits carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from power plants and requires them to buy allowances to cover their emissions. Power plants that reduce emissions further can sell their allowances. Supporters of RGGI say it has reduced CO2 emissions and raised $860 million for participating states at auctions of the allowances. New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, a Republican, announced in May that his state will leave the program later this year.</p>
<p align="center">For additional information see: <a href="http://blog.timesunion.com/capitol/archives/73035/suit-hits-cuomo-dec-nyserda-over-cap-and-trade/" target="_blank">Albany Times Union</a>, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/APe8cadf1236ce4ee2aa175b886b435e45.html" target="_blank">Associated Press</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="461"><strong><a name="4">Insurers Study Climate Change to Decide Rate Hikes in Alabama</a></strong></p>
<p align="left">Insurance companies are considering rate hikes for homeowners after devastating tornadoes caused $2.5 to 3.5 billion in losses on April 27 in Alabama. The amount of rate increases depends on whether or not the storms are considered a new normal pattern caused by climate change. At only halfway through the year, Alabama’s tornado total is already three times the average and there have been more F4 and F5 storms than any other year. According to Lee Bowron of the Birmingham actuarial consulting firm Kerper and Bowron, LLC, insurance rates are based on models that predict the frequency and intensity of disasters, and “re-insurers and insurers are now evaluating tornado risk in light of the recent outbreak.” Brian Thomas, a sustainability consultant who formerly worked in the reinsurance industry, says, &#8220;the global re-insurers are very concerned about climate change. As far as they are concerned, there is a pretty clear signal.&#8221; However, a preliminary National Weather Service evaluation of climate variables known to cause tornadoes in the Southeast doesn&#8217;t show a global warming-related trend that can be linked to the severe outbreak. While insurance companies may want to raise rates to compensate for the threat of climate change, they can only raise them so much before they begin to lose customers.</p>
<p align="center">For additional information see: <a href="http://blog.al.com/spotnews/2011/06/insurers_study_climate_change.html" target="_blank">The Birmingham News</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="461"><strong><a name="5">EPA Report Outlines Climate Adaptation Options for Coastline</a></strong></p>
<p align="left">A new federal report on climate adaptation suggests that development in some low lying coastal areas will have to give way to rising sea levels. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in June released “Rolling Easements,” a primer for communities to preserve development rights of shoreline property owners while acknowledging that some coastal properties will be economically or environmentally infeasible to defend from rising sea levels. “Defending coastal development from the rising sea would prevent wetlands from migrating inland, expose large numbers of people to the hazard of living below sea level, and often cost more than what the property being protected is worth,” the report stated. The report detailed land-use and legal tools that would allow coastal development, but prohibit seawalls and shoreline protections from being built in some areas. Proposals include issuing regulations or transferring the rights to build shoreline protections from owners who would do so to organizations that would not. This allows property to be put to its highest use, but it can be converted to wetland or beach once it is threatened by rising seas.</p>
<p align="center">For additional information see: <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/a-new-way-of-thinking-as-sea-levels-rise/2011/06/23/AGq96TmH_story.html" target="_blank">The Washington Post</a>, <a href="http://www.epa.gov/cre/downloads/rollingeasementsprimer.pdf" target="_blank">Report</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="461"><strong><a name="6"><br />
African Women Left Out of Climate Projects, Experts Say</a></strong></p>
<p align="left">Advocates are concerned that the important role of women in Africa is being ignored as the international community finances climate mitigation and adaptation projects. “There is a lot of talk about climate change funding for local communities and especially for women, but not much is actually happening,” said Ange Bukasa, a delegate to the Climate Investment Funds (CIF) 2011 Partnership Forum. The forum was held June 24 and 25. Set up by the World Bank, CIF has allocated $6.5 billion to projects in 45 developing nations, including 15 in Africa. More than 70 percent of the money is financing large clean technology energy and transportation projects, which advocates say are traditionally male-dominated sectors. In Africa, women make up 80 percent of the smallholder farmers, who are key to the food security of the continent. &#8220;We are planning to take gender into greater account and are introducing more and more indicators to assess the gender dimension of projects,&#8221; said Mafalda Duarte, climate finance coordinator at the African Development Bank, which is administering the funds. She said the technological improvements financed by CIF will improve the lives of women in rural communities.</p>
<p align="center">For additional information see:  <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/jun/28/climate-change-environmental-sustainability" target="_blank">The Guardian</a>, <a href="http://www.climateinvestmentfunds.org/cif/partnership_forum_2011_home" target="_blank">Forum Website</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="461"><strong><a name="7">Rising Waters Swamp West African Nation’s Capital</a></strong></p>
<p align="left">Parts of Mauritania’s capital city have become uninhabitable marshes, which experts and residents fear is only a preview of more significant flooding as climate change causes sea levels to rise. Mauritanian government studies suggest that nearly 80 percent of its capital, Nouakchott, could be under water in 10 to 20 years. Already, residents in some neighborhoods are demanding compensation for flooding. Water is pooling during the rainy season as the water table has risen in recent years. &#8220;Nouakchott is located in a depression 50 centimetres below sea level,” said Ould Lefdal, director of environmental services. “The sea is advancing towards the city at a rate of 25 meters per year.&#8221; Marico Demba, head of the Climate and Coastal Change Project in West Africa, said Mauritania may not have the resources to respond to the threat. Other factors include the development of the harbor and the use of beach sand for construction, which have removed natural barriers to flooding. The capital lacks proper drainage systems. And, large quantities of drinking water withdrawn from a nearby river leak into the ground through faulty pipes.</p>
<p align="center">For additional information see:  <a href="http://www.ips.org/africa/2011/06/mauritania-could-lose-its-capital-city-to-the-sea/" target="_blank">Inter Press Service</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="461"><strong><a name="8">Research Partnership to Tackle Food and Climate Challenges</a></strong></p>
<p align="left">Thirty-six countries signed an agreement in June to cooperate on research to expand global food production while reducing greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture. Development of the New Zealand-led Global Research Alliance on Agriculture and Greenhouse Gas Emissions has proceeded since its creation in 2009. It includes the United States, China and Brazil. The United States has agreed to contribute $90 million over four years to step up agricultural research. The partnership encourages scientific exchanges, facilitates joint research programs, and disseminates information. “About as much emissions come out of growing food as come out of every truck on the planet, every car, every plane, every boat, every train,” said Tim Groser, the New Zealand minister of trade. “So, we’ve got to try to reduce that because food is not an option. And we think we can do this, but we’ve got to bring to bear some of the world’s finest scientific minds.” The agreement was signed June 24 at a ceremony in Rome.</p>
<p align="center">For additional information see: <a href="http://www.voanews.com/english/news/africa/decapua-global-research-alliance-24jun11-124486764.html" target="_blank">Voice of America News (includes audio)</a>, <a href="http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/rural/78450/new-fund-to-support-emissions-research" target="_blank">Radio New Zealand News</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="461"><strong><a name="9">Study: California Wineries at Risk from Rising Temperatures</a></strong></p>
<p align="left">Climate change could put a big squeeze on the premium wine industry in California by vastly reducing the amount of land suitable for growing high-value grapes, a Stanford University study found. By 2040, the effects of rising temperatures could reduce the amount of land suitable for growing premium grapes by 50 percent. The wine industry is a major economic engine in California. Its retail value was $18.5 billion in 2010. California produced more than five million gallons of wine, representing 90 percent of the total produced in the United States. The study assumed average global temperatures would rise by 1 degree Celsius, a conservative estimate. “Our new study looks at climate change during the next 30 years, a timeframe over which people are actually considering the costs and benefits of making decisions on the ground,&#8221; said study co-author Noah Diffenbaugh, an assistant professor at Stanford. The study was published in the journal Environmental Research Letters in June. It suggested climate adaptation strategies that can limit the projected losses. Wine growers could plant in new locations and use more heat tolerant varieties of grapes, alter the design of vineyards, and adjust winery processing procedures.</p>
<p align="center">For additional information see: <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/06/110630091821.htm?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%253A+sciencedaily%252Fearth_climate+%28ScienceDaily%253A+Earth+%2526+Climate+News%29" target="_blank">Science Daily</a>, <a href="http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/6/2/024024/" target="_blank">Study</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="461"><strong><a name="10">Near-Record Global Temperatures Recorded in 2010</a></strong></p>
<p align="left">Last year was one of the two warmest years on record, a federal agency reported. Released June 28, the “State of the Climate Report,” produced by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), tracked 41 climate indicators. Although several cities in the United States experienced record snowfalls and Europe experienced the coldest winter in three decades, average global sea and land temperatures are increasingly consistent with climate change, NOAA reported. Greenland recorded record-breaking temperatures and its ice sheet lost more mass during 2010 than at any time in the prior 10 years. Meanwhile, Russia experienced a deadly heat wave. Australia suffered significant flooding. Other parts of the globe experienced droughts. “We’re continuing to closely track these indicators because it is quite clear that the climate of the past cannot be assumed to represent the climate of the future,” said Thomas Karl, director of NOAA’s National Climate Data Center.</p>
<p align="center">For additional information see: <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/capital-weather-gang/post/noaa-climate-report-array-of-indicators-demonstrate-global-warming/2011/06/28/AGMvtXpH_blog.html" target="_blank">The Washington Post</a>, <a href="http://www1.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/cmb/bams-sotc/2010/bams-sotc-2010-brochure-lo-rez.pdf" target="_blank">Synopsis</a>, <a href="http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/bams-state-of-the-climate/" target="_blank">Report</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="461"><strong><a name="11"></a></strong></p>
<p><strong><a name="11">Rockies Losing Colorful Flowers as Temperatures Rise, Study Finds</a></strong></p>
<p align="left">The colorful flowers that brighten the meadows of the Rocky Mountains in the middle of the summer are fading because of factors that include climate change, a new study found. As temperatures have risen in the high altitude meadows and conditions turned drier, the flowers have become less abundant, particularly during the middle of the summer. Not only would the Rockies lose a splash of color as the world turns warmer, but other species, such as pollinators, would be affected. “The resulting longer periods of flowering abundance in the middle of the summer season could negatively affect pollinators that are active throughout the season, and shifts in flowering peaks within habitats might create mismatches between floral resources and demand by pollinators with limited foraging ranges,” the study stated. The study was funded by the National Science Foundation. It appears in the July edition of the <em>Journal of Ecology</em>.</p>
<p align="center">For additional information see: <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/greenspace/2011/06/mountain-flowers-fading.html" target="_blank">Los Angeles Times</a>, <a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01826.x/abstract" target="_blank">Study Abstract</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="461"><strong><a name="12">Climate Change to Decrease Salinity of Baltic Sea, Scientists Say</a></strong></p>
<p align="left">Climate change is adding stress to the marine life of the Baltic Sea, which is expected to become less salty in the coming decades, according to scientists involved in a multinational research project. Climate change is expected to increase precipitation in the region, sending greater volumes of freshwater into the semi-enclosed and brackish Baltic Sea from its river basins, according to Climate Change &amp; European Marine Ecosystem Research. Warmer water temperatures also are expected to aid invasive species arriving from the Mediterranean. Add the legacy of overfishing and chemical pollution into the mix, and the result could be the loss or decline of several native species, scientists warned. The research project is a European Union effort involving 17 academic institutions to disseminate research on climate mitigation and adaptation to the public and policymakers.</p>
<p align="center">For additional information see: <a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01826.x/abstract" target="_blank">The Independent</a>, <a href="http://www.clamer.eu/" target="_blank">Project Website</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="461"><strong><a name="13">Researchers Find Droughts Make Water Pollutants More Toxic</a></strong></p>
<p align="left">Droughts could harm freshwater fish by exacerbating the toxicity of common pollutants in lakes and rivers, a new study found. Climate change is expected to lead to drier conditions in some regions. “We may be underestimating or overestimating the adverse effects of some chemicals on fish,” said Bryan Brooks, an associate professor at Baylor University and co-author of the study. Baylor researchers sampled water from 23 streams during a two-year period. They found that dry spells raised the pH level of water, which, in turn, increased the toxicity of pollutants like ammonia and allowed them to more readily accumulate in fish. One-third of pesticides used today include weak base compounds similar to those in ammonia. The study was published online in the journal<em> Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management</em>.</p>
<p align="center">For additional information see: <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/06/110628151641.htm?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%253A+sciencedaily%252Fearth_climate+%28ScienceDaily%253A+Earth+%2526+Climate+News%29" target="_blank">Science Daily</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p align="left"><strong><a name="20">Other Headlines</a></strong></p>
<div>
<ul>
<div>
<li><a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/06/110627122947.htm?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%253A+sciencedaily%252Fearth_climate+%28ScienceDaily%253A+Earth+%2526+Climate+News%29" target="_blank">Law Professor Eyes Prize-Based Incentives to Generate Climate Innovation</a></li>
<li><a href="http://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/06/24/grasping-climate-change-at-a-garden-plot-level/" target="_blank">Grasping Climate Change at a Garden-Plot Level</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.environmental-finance.com/news/view/1816" target="_blank">One-Fifth of EU Budget Earmarked for Tackling Climate Change</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-06-26/antarctica-s-pine-glacier-melting-50-faster-study-indicates.html" target="_blank">West Antarctica’s Biggest Glacier Is Melting 50% Faster Than 17 Years Ago</a></li>
</div>
</ul>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="461"><strong><a name="15">Federal Legislative Action</a></strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>S.1292: Employment Protection Act of 2011:</strong> On June 29, S.1291 was introduced and referred to the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works.</p>
<p><strong>Intent:</strong> To require the Environmental Protection Agency to consider the impact on employment levels and economic activity prior to issuing a regulation, policy statement, guidance document, endangerment finding, or other requirement, implementing any new or substantially altered program, or denying any permit, and for other purposes.</p>
<p><strong>Previous Action:</strong> No previous action.</p>
<p><strong>Sponsor:</strong> Sen. Pat Toomey (R-PA)</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">For more information: <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d112:SN01292:" target="_blank">S.1292</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="461"><strong><a name="16">July 15: Electric Transmission 205: Economic Stimulus and Jobs Benefits</a></strong></p>
<p align="left">The Environmental and Energy Study Institute (EESI) and WIRES (Working group for Investment in Reliable and Economic electric Systems) invite you to a briefing on how the manufacture and construction of electric transmission infrastructure can make a major contribution to reversing the nation’s stagnation in employment and economic activity. The electric transmission system is a critical and strategic asset for our nation. As policymakers focus on infrastructure development as an engine of new jobs and economic activity, this panel is a reminder that electric transmission – developed at the levels that experts project the country will need over the next two decades – is at the center of economic revitalization. The briefing will be held on July 15, 10:00-11:30 AM, in Congressional Meeting Room North in the Capitol Visitor Center. This event is free and open to the public. For more information contact Laura Parsons at lparsons [at] eesi.org or (202) 662-1884.</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="461"><strong><a name="17">July 21: Cool Roofs for Cooler Summers</a></strong></p>
<p align="left">The Environmental and Energy Study Institute (EESI) invites you to a briefing on the huge potential for solar-reflective roofs and other “cool-roofing” techniques to lower the surface temperature of buildings and entire cities. Cool roofs improve comfort on hot summer days and reduce the amount of energy used for air-conditioning – thereby reducing energy costs and improving air quality. Whitening flat roofs is a low-cost solution which, if implemented in certain cities across the globe, has been estimated to have the potential to offset the carbon emissions of 300 million automobiles. At this briefing, renowned physicist and energy efficiency expert Arthur Rosenfeld will discuss research at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) that for the first time quantifies the reflective power (albedo) of urban surfaces that would be necessary to mitigate the urban heat-island effect and offset carbon dioxide emissions. Panelists also will discuss insulated and vegetated (“green”) roofs and how different types of cool roofs may be combined or integrated with solar-roofing systems, photovoltaics (PV) and/or solar thermal technology. The briefing will be held on July 21, 2:00-3:30 PM, in the Capital Visitors Center room SVC 212/210. This event is free and open to the public. No RSVP required. For more information contact Ellen Vaughan at evaughan [at] eesi.org or (202) 662-1893.</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Writers: Dave Gershman, Justin Jones and Matthew Johnson</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Please distribute <em>Climate Change News</em> to your colleagues.    Permission for reproduction of this newsletter is granted provided that   the Environmental and Energy Study Institute is properly acknowledged as   the source.  Past issues are available <a href="http://www.eesi.org/ccn_archives">here</a>.  Free email subscriptions are available <a href="http://visitor.constantcontact.com/email.jsp?m=1101500533487&amp;p=oi">here</a>.  We welcome your <a href="http://www.eesi.org/contact">suggestions, comments, and questions</a>.</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr style="text-align: center;">
<td><strong>The Environmental and Energy Study Institute (EESI) is a non-profit organization founded in 1984 by a bipartisan Congressional caucus dedicated to finding innovative environmental and energy solutions.  EESI works to protect the climate and ensure a healthy, secure, and sustainable future for America through policymaker education, coalition building, and policy development in the areas of energy efficiency, renewable energy, agriculture, forestry, transportation, buildings, and urban planning. </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong><br />
<strong><a href="https://secure.groundspring.org/dn/index.php?aid=480"><img class="image image-_original" src="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/donate.jpg" alt="" width="90" height="39" /></a></strong><br />
<strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>EESI&#8217;s work, including this free newsletter, is made possible by financial support from people like you. Please help us continue to make it available by making a secure, online donation today by clicking <a href="https://secure.groundspring.org/dn/index.php?aid=480">here</a> or mailing a check to Environmental and Energy Study Institute; 1112 16th St NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20036. Please contact Susan Williams at (202) 662-1887<span class="skype_pnh_container" dir="ltr"><span class="skype_pnh_highlighting_inactive_common" title="Call this phone number in United States of America with Skype: +12026621887" dir="ltr"><span class="skype_pnh_textarea_span"><span class="skype_pnh_text_span"> </span></span><span class="skype_pnh_right_span">or s</span></span></span>ee <a href="http://www.eesi.org/donate">www.eesi.org/donate</a> to find out more. Thank you for your support!</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="lsidebar" style="background-color: #FFFFFF; 	padding: 10px;" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<hr />Climate Action Hotline is the new weekly update by the US Climate Action Network. <a class="lsidebar" style="background-color: #FFFFFF;" href="http://bit.ly/mcGUCQ" target="_blank">Let us know what you think</a>.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
<td width="246" valign="top" bgcolor="#ebebeb">
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><img src="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/images/email/cah-member-blogs/" alt="Headlines" width="246" height="33" /></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="rsidebar" style="background-color:#EBEBEB;" valign="top">
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kelly-rigg/eu-emissions-cap_b_889912.html" target="_blank">Aviation Industry on Trial: The Dark Arts of Climate Obstructionism<br />
</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a title="Dr. Willie Soon: a Career Fueled by Koch, Big Oil and Coal" href="http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/en/news-and-blogs/campaign-blog/dr-willie-soon-a-career-fueled-by-koch-big-oi/blog/35482" target="_blank">Dr. Willie Soon: a Career Fueled by Koch, Big  Oil and Coal</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/lcv_actgreen/%7E3/7iG2dfIiPBc/climate-scientists-launch-international.html" target="_blank">Climate Scientists Launch International Coalition<br />
</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/csteger/google_shows_importance_of_cli.html" target="_blank">Google Shows Importance of Climate and Clean  Energy Policies Alongside Innovation Investment</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://sierraclub.typepad.com/michaelbrune/2011/07/oil-bicycles-fuel-ecnomy-gas.html" target="_blank">Let&#8217;s Think Differently and Move Beyond Oil</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.wwfblogs.org/climate/content/governor-christie-stops-new-jersey-addressing-climate-change-ignoring-perils-his-state" target="_blank">Governor Christie Stops New Jersey from  Addressing Climate Change, Ignoring the Perils to his State </a></li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><img src="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/images/email/ca_email_headlines.jpg" alt="Headlines" width="246" height="33" /></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="rsidebar" style="background-color:#EBEBEB;" valign="top">
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/mountain-snowmelt-swells-yellowstone-river-complicating-exxons-oil-spill-cleanup-in-montana/2011/07/05/gHQAJKqjyH_story.html?wprss=rss_national" target="_blank">Mountain  snowmelt swells Yellowstone River, complicating Exxon’s oil spill cleanup in  Montana</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2011/07/01/01greenwire-with-start-of-july-more-facilities-need-co2-pe-76189.html" target="_blank">With Start of July, More Facilities Need CO2 Permits</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/pittsburgh/s_745245.html#ixzz1REXMPF7c" target="_blank">Pro-drilling Group Develops Middle  School Curriculum &#8211; Pittsburgh Tribune-Review</a></li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="background-color:#EBEBEB;" valign="top"><img src="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/ca_email_international.jpg" alt="International Articles" width="246" height="33" /></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="rsidebar" style="background-color:#EBEBEB;" valign="top">
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/cwire/2011/07/05/05climatewire-us-eu-showdown-over-airline-emissions-begins-88684.html" target="_blank">U.S.-E.U. Showdown Over Airline Emissions Begins Today</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://old.news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20110705/wl_asia_afp/chinaoilenvironment" target="_blank">China  Oil Spill to Have Long-Term Impact: Report</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/07/05/us-australia-carbon-idUSTRE7622JB20110705?feedType=RSS&amp;feedName=GCA-GreenBusiness&amp;utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+reuters%2FUSgreenbusinessNews+%28News+%2F+US+%2F+Green+Business%29" target="_blank">Australia  Eyes $3.2 Billion CO2 Plan for Generators: Report</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=137592343" target="_blank">Merkel:  Binding, Verifiable Climate Targets Needed</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.businessgreen.com/bg/news/2083935/green-tell-eu-stand-firm-aviation-emissions-goes-court" target="_blank">Green Groups Tell EU to Stand Firm as Aviation Emissions Case  Goes to Court</a></li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><img src="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/images/email/ca_email_coverage.jpg" alt="Special Coverage" width="246" height="33" /></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="rsidebar" style="background-color: #EBEBEB;padding: 10px;"><a href="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/2011-calendar"><img src="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/intlcalendar2011_blogsidebar.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="226" height="183" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/category/clean-air-act-digest/"><img src="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/CAA_digesthotline.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="226" height="121" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/policy/the-clean-air-act"><img src="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/CAA_hotline.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="226" height="121" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/"><img src="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/images/email/cah_climateactionhotline.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="226" height="109" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/category/hot-pubs/"><img src="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/hotpubs_hotline.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="226" height="70" /></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><img src="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/images/email/ca_email_video.jpg" alt="Video Of The Week" width="246" height="33" /></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://youtu.be/IaKm89eVhoE" target="_blank"><img src="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/kochbrothers.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="246" height="200" /></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><img src="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/images/email/ca_email_quote.jpg" alt="Quote Of The Week" width="246" height="33" /></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="text" style="background-color: #EBEBEB;padding: 10px;" valign="top"><strong><em>“So far the evidence shows that the more people understand that there is this consensus, the more they tend to believe that climate change is happening, the more they understand that humans are a major contributor, and the more worried they are about it.” </em></strong></p>
<p>–  Anthony Leiserowitz, Yale University Project on Climate Change Communication</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.usclimatenetwork.org%2Fhotline%2Ftoss-another-skeptic-on-the-barbie%25e2%2580%25a6-climate-action-hotline-7-5-11%2F&amp;title=Toss%20another%20skeptic%20on%20the%20barbie%E2%80%A6.%2CClimate%20Action%20Hotline%2C%207.5.11" id="wpa2a_4"><img src="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p><p>Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hotline/global-business-leaders-push-for-more-action-on-climate-change-climate-action-hotline-10-24-11/' rel='bookmark' title='Global Business Leaders Push for More Action on Climate Change, Climate Action Hotline 10.24.11'>Global Business Leaders Push for More Action on Climate Change, Climate Action Hotline 10.24.11</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hotline/climate-action-hotline-3-21-11/' rel='bookmark' title='Climate Action Hotline, 3.21.11'>Climate Action Hotline, 3.21.11</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hotline/2485/' rel='bookmark' title='Imagine a World Where Politicians Get it About Climate, Climate Action Hotline 3.7.11'>Imagine a World Where Politicians Get it About Climate, Climate Action Hotline 3.7.11</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hotline/toss-another-skeptic-on-the-barbie%e2%80%a6-climate-action-hotline-7-5-11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Climate Action Hotline, 3.21.11</title>
		<link>http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hotline/climate-action-hotline-3-21-11/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hotline/climate-action-hotline-3-21-11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 19:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>USCAN</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hotline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean air act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate denier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feature Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lisa Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/?p=2511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter Bahouth, Executive Director March 21, 2011 Climate Action Hotline Under the guise of protecting small businesses, higher gas prices and continued high unemployment numbers, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) pushed to prevent the Environmental Protection Agency from moving forward on new pollution regulations, but failed to get to a vote Thursday, after days [...]
Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hotline/climate-action-hotline-4-4-11/' rel='bookmark' title='Climate Action Hotline, 4.4.11'>Climate Action Hotline, 4.4.11</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hotline/the-epa-is-under-siege-but-support-for-public-health-is-holding-strong-climate-action-hotline-2-7-11/' rel='bookmark' title='The EPA Is Under Siege but Support for Public Health Is Holding Strong, Climate Action Hotline 2.7.11'>The EPA Is Under Siege but Support for Public Health Is Holding Strong, Climate Action Hotline 2.7.11</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hotline/rising-up-climate-action-network-4-18-11/' rel='bookmark' title='Rising up, Climate Action Hotline 4.18.11'>Rising up, Climate Action Hotline 4.18.11</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="741" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="emailcontainer" style="border: 8px solid #2C6A9C;padding-top: 0px;padding-right: 0px;padding-bottom: 0px;padding-left: 0px;" width="757" valign="top">
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="741">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="emailheader" style="padding:0;" colspan="2"><a href="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/category/hotline/"><img src="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/images/email/ca_email_header.jpg" border="0" alt="US Climate Action Network" width="741" height="85" /></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="495" valign="top">
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="feature" style="padding:10px;text-align: left;background-color: #96C3DA;line-height: 16px;" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:14px;"><strong>Peter Bahouth, Executive Director</p>
<p>March 21, 2011 </strong></p>
<p><strong>Climate Action Hotline</strong></p>
<table border="0" align="right">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<table border="0" align="right">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><a href="xxxxxxxxxxxxxx"><img src="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/U.S.-Senate.JPG" border="0" alt="" width="209" height="150" /></a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Under the guise of protecting small businesses, higher gas prices and continued high unemployment numbers, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) pushed to prevent the Environmental Protection Agency from moving forward on new pollution regulations, but failed to get to a vote Thursday, after days of enigmatic maneuvering that made it appear the measure was close to being voted on several times.  The amendment to bar EPA ability to set standards for carbon pollution came on the heels of the House passage of  Rep. Upton’s (R-MI) Dirty Air Act.</p>
<p>The White House came out strong against the GOP amendment to nullify the EPA’s power to set standards for carbon pollution.  Many feel that the White House decision to weigh in directly on the amendment signifies the ever-escalating stakes of the Republican-led effort to obliterate what is seen as the Obama leftist agenda.  “This amendment rolls back the Clean Air Act and harms Americans&#8217; health by taking away our ability to decrease air pollution,” said Clark Stevens, a White House spokesman.</p>
<p>While McConnell’s amendment faces major hurdles to passage, but it remains a tough vote for politically vulnerable centrist Democrats and moderate Republicans. Yet another new EPA-specific measure added to the mix by Montana Sen. Max Baucus (D) would ensure that agriculture sources would be exempt from climate rules, while preventing the agency from regulating large stationary sources that do not exceed other pollutant limits.  In addition, Senator Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) offered his bill that is a  2-year stop work order on any EPA plans to set standards for carbon pollution.</p>
<p>Rockefeller’s bill, cloaked in a shroud of a “middle path” approach, is just another means to an end: an end that ignores the science, health and environment of Americans.  All three initiatives were introduced as amendments to a pending small business bill, creating what Rockefeller referred to as a &#8220;swirl&#8221; of options for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) to navigate.</p>
<p>In response to Japan’s ongoing nuclear reactor crisis, President Obama asked the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to make a comprehensive safety review of U.S. nuclear plants with specific focus on their ability to withstand natural calamities. NRC Chairman Gregory Jaczko continues to reinforce that the commission considers the 104 active U.S. nuclear plants to be secure, but the evidence from Japan&#8217;s devastating reactor damage would be the basis for a new review. &#8220;But I want to emphasize and stress that we have a very robust program where we look at the safety and the security of our nuclear facilities on a minute-by-minute basis. &#8221;  In related news, a new <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2011-03-17 rw_nukepoll14_ST_N.htm?csp=34news" target="_blank">USA Today/Gallup poll</a> shows a dramatic decline of support for nuclear power in the wake of the ongoing Japanese earthquake-tsunami one-two punch: 70% say they&#8217;ve grown more concerned about the industry&#8217;s safety based on the crisis unfolding at reactors in Japan.  Americans oppose building more nuclear plants by 47%-44%, the poll finds. Support for using nuclear energy was at 57% when Gallup asked a similar question about a week before Friday&#8217;s earthquake and tsunami left Japan struggling to avert catastrophic meltdowns and fires at three damaged nuclear plants.</p>
<p>On Wednesday, the EPA issued a new proposed rule that would reduce emissions of toxic air pollutants from power plants including mercury, arsenic, chromium, nickel, chloride (HCl) and hydrogen fluoride (HF).  The proposal would reduce emissions from new and existing coal- and oil-fired electric utility steam generating units (EGUs). The rules would replace President Bush’s Clean Air Mercury Rule, a cap-and-trade program that would have forced power plants to cut their mercury emissions by 70 percent. In 2008, a federal court ordered EPA to go back to the drawing board. The target of this proposed rule includes toxics suspected of causing cancer and other serious health effects. Power plants are the largest source of mercury emissions to the air. Mercury and other power plant emissions also damage ecosystems and destroy the health of lakes, streams and fish.  Other toxic metals emitted from power plants, such as arsenic, chromium and nickel can cause cancer. A side benefit of the rule is that it will reduce power plant particulate pollution, preventing thousands of premature deaths, tens of thousands of heart attacks, bronchitis cases and asthma episodes.</p>
<p>Georgia Power, the largest subsidiary of Southern Company, announced plans to close two coal-fired power plants units in central Georgia, saying the cost is too high to equip them to meet current and pending environmental regulations.  The two units in Putnam County have a capacity of 569 megawatts. The announcement comes as renewed attention is focusing on Georgia Power&#8217;s nuclear plants because of the continuing crisis in Japan. Georgia Power has four nuclear reactors and is one of two U.S. utilities building new ones. The company has advocated for nuclear power as regulations tighten on coal.  The company had hinted last year that it might close some of its coal plants because of regulations on air emissions, water treatment and the disposal of ash coal waste.</p>
<p>Kellyn Eberhardt, Southeast Regional Coordinator</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="lsidebar" style="background-color: #FFFFFF; padding: 10px;" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><img src="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/images/email/ca_email_actionalert.gif" alt="Action Alert" width="475" height="32" /></p>
<p><strong>Tell Congress to Let EPA Do Its Job and Protect Public Health</strong></p>
<p>Representative  Fred Upton (R-MI), Chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee,  introduced a bill that would permanently block the Environmental Protection  Agency (EPA) from limiting dangerous carbon pollution.</p>
<p>This  Dirty Air Act is moving through the House legislative process quickly&#8211; in part  because the sponsors want to hide the devastating health impacts.  Just  this past week, the bill was passed out of the Energy and Commerce Committee  and now it will move to the House floor, where it will likely be loaded down by  amendments that will further compromise the air we breathe.</p>
<p>Meanwhile,  a handful of Senators are responsible for a sneak attack on the Clean Air  Act.  Minority Leader McConnell (R-KY) has proposed amending a small  business bill with Upton’s Dirty Air Act, as introduced by Senator Inhofe  (R-OK).  Like the House bill, his amendment would permanently repeal the  Clean Air Act’s authority to set limits on carbon pollution. Senator  Rockefeller (D-WV) has an amendment that would delay the EPA’s ability to  control green house gases.  As history has shown, delays like these are  often impossible to repeal.</p>
<p>We  all rely on the Environmental Protection Agency to protect our public health by  regulating the nation’s biggest polluters.  Send a message now urging your  Senators and Representative to vote against these attacks on the Clean Air Act,  or any measure that would block EPA’s ability to clean up our air. See  NRDC&#8217;s <a href="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/resource-database/tell-congress-to-let-epa-do-its-job-and-protect-public-health" target="_blank">sample action alert </a>or contact Jamie Consuegra <a href="mailto:jconsuegra@nrdc.org" target="_blank">jconsuegra@nrdc.org</a> for  more information.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="lsidebar" style="background-color: #FFFFFF; padding: 10px;" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><img src="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/eesi.jpg" alt="EESI" width="475" height="105" /></p>
<h3>Carol Werner, Executive Director</p>
<p>March 21, 2011</h3>
<h3>News</h3>
<ul>
<li><a class="anchor-link" href="#1"><br />
McConnell Files Anti-EPA Amendment to Small Business Bill</a></li>
<li><a class="anchor-link" href="#2">House Committee Passes Bill to Block EPA’s GHG Authority</a></li>
<li><a class="anchor-link" href="#3">New York, Others Prepare for Supreme Court to Hear GHG Public Nuisance Lawsuit</a></li>
<li><a class="anchor-link" href="#4">Virginia Supreme Court to Hear State Attorney General’s Appeal in Climate Fraud Case</a></li>
<li><a class="anchor-link" href="#5">Carbon Credits Rise as Germany Prepares to Close Older Reactors for Safety Review</a></li>
<li><a class="anchor-link" href="#6">EU Sets Auction Amount for 2013 Emissions Allowances </a></li>
<li><a class="anchor-link" href="#7">Automobile Emissions in UK Drop 3.5 Percent in 2010</a></li>
<li><a class="anchor-link" href="#8">Study Reveals Pre-Historic Global Warming More Common Than Previously Thought</a></li>
<li><a class="anchor-link" href="#9">Researchers Show New More Accurate Carbon-Mapping Technique</a></li>
<li><a class="anchor-link" href="#10">Plasticity of Plants Helps Them Adapt to Climate Change</a></li>
<li><a class="anchor-link" href="#11">NASA Study Finds Relationship between Earth’s Core and Climate Change</a></li>
<li><a class="anchor-link" href="#12">Septic Tank Emissions Found to be Half of Previous Estimates</a></li>
<li><a class="anchor-link" href="#13">Northern Peatlands Contributed Less Methane at End of Ice Age than Thought</a></li>
<li><a class="anchor-link" href="#20">Other Headlines</a></li>
</ul>
<h3>Events</h3>
<ul>
<li><a class="anchor-link" href="#18">April 6: Hydropower in America: Energy Generation and Job Potential</a></li>
</ul>
<table border="1" cellspacing="2" width="471">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="461"><strong><a name="1">McConnell Files Anti-EPA Amendment to Small Business Bill</a></strong></p>
<p align="left">McConnell Files Anti-EPA Amendment to Small Business Bill</p>
<p>On March 15, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) introduced an amendment to a small business bill to block the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) authority to control greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The McConnell amendment closely resembled the bill H.R. 910, now under consideration in the House. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) indicated he would schedule a vote for the Small Business Innovation Research/Small Business Technology Transfer (SBIR/STTR) Reauthorization Act of 2011 (S. 493), despite the inclusion of the amendment, but the date has yet to be determined. Authored by Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK), the bill mirrors the McConnell amendment, has the support of 42 Republicans and one Democrat, Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV).</p>
<p align="center">For additional information see: <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2011/03/15/mcconnell-jumps-on-anti-epa-wagon/?mod=google_news_blog" target="_blank">Wall Street Journal</a>, <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/677-e2-wire/149635-mcconnell-seeks-to-quick-showdown-on-epa-climate-rules" target="_blank">The Hill</a>, <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0311/51383.html" target="_blank">Politico</a>, <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/D?d112:1:./temp/%7EbdyJNO::%7C/home/LegislativeData.php%7C" target="_top">SBIR/STTR Reauthorization Bill</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="461"><strong><a name="2"><br />
House Committee Passes Bill to Block EPA’s GHG Authority</a></strong></p>
<p align="left">On March 15, the House Energy and Commerce Committee passed H.R. 910, a bill intended to strip the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of its authority to regulate greenhouse gases (GHG). Co-authored by Rep. Fred Upton (R-MI) and Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK), the bill cleared its second legislative hurdle on a 34-19 vote, after the Energy and Power Subcommittee approved passage days earlier on a voice vote. Three Democrats, Rep. John Barrow (D-GA), Jim Matheson (D-UT), and Rep. Mike Ross (D-AR), joined a unanimous Republican voting bloc. Specifically, the bill would repeal the EPA’s 2009 “endangerment finding” that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases are a threat to human health, and bar the agency from implementing rules to control them. A floor vote on H.R. 910 is expected later this Spring.</p>
<p align="left">In related news, several Democrats on the   House Energy and Commerce Committee introduced amendments to the   Inhofe/Upton bill intended to put Congress on record as either   supporting or denying the science of climate change. Rep. Henry Waxman   (D-CA) introduced an amendment to H.R. 910 that Congress accept the   EPA’s finding that global warming is unequivocal, which failed on a   party-line vote 31-20. Rep. Diana DeGette (D-CO) offered an amendment   that stated Congress accepts the EPA’s finding that “the scientific   evidence is compelling” that man-made emissions “are the root cause of   recently observed climate change.” That measure also failed by the same   margin. Rep. Jay Inslee (D-WA) also offered an amendment that Congress   accept EPA’s finding that climate change threatens human health. It was   defeated 31-21. The three Democrats who voted in favor of H.R. 910,   Reps. Ross, Matheson, and Barrow, voted in favor of all three   amendments.</p>
<p>For additional information on the Bill passage see: <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-house-epa-vote-20110316,0,2784801.story" target="_blank">LA Times</a>, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/16/us/politics/16epa.html?_r=1" target="_blank">NY Times</a>, <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/D?d112:1:./temp/%7EbdSUJG:@@@L&amp;summ2=m&amp;%7C/home/LegislativeData.php?n=BSS;c=112%7C" target="_blank">H.R. 910</a></p>
<p>For additional information on the Democratic amendments see: <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0311/51338.html" target="_blank">Politico</a>, <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-house-epa-vote-20110316,0,2784801.story" target="_blank">LA Times</a>, <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/677-e2-wire/149011-house-dems-ready-amendments-for-climate-bill-markup" target="_blank">Politico</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="461"><strong><a name="3">New York, Others Prepare for Supreme Court to Hear GHG Public Nuisance Lawsuit </a></strong></p>
<p align="left">On March 14, New York State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman filed a brief with the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of six states and New York City in a public nuisance lawsuit against five utilities over their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Filed in 2004, the lawsuit considers whether states and other entities have the right to sue major utilities because their power stations are causing a public nuisance with their GHG emissions. The states named in the lawsuit are New York, California, Connecticut, Iowa, Rhode Island, Vermont, plus New York City. The U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the states’ right to bring the suit, American Electric Power Co. Inc. v. Connecticut in 2009. However, the electric companies, American Electric Power, the Southern Company, Xcel Energy, the Cinergy Corporation and the Tennessee Valley Authority, appealed and the U.S. Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments next month and decide on the case in July.</p>
<p align="left">In related news, on March 11, New Jersey Attorney General Paula Dow informed the U.S. Supreme Court that her state will withdraw from the public nuisance lawsuit. In a statement to the Associated Press, Dow’s spokesperson said, “Considering the Supreme Court&#8217;s ruling and the Obama Administration&#8217;s subsequent position that the EPA must determine an appropriate plan of action, it does not make sense to incur further taxpayer expense on an unnecessary lawsuit.&#8221; Wisconsin withdrew from the lawsuit in February.</p>
<p align="center">For additional information see:  <a href="http://www.businessgreen.com/bg/news/2034401/accuse-polluting-power-stations-public-nuisance" target="_blank">Business Green</a>, <a href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/03/15/nyc-six-states-take-ghg-suit-to-supreme-court/" target="_blank">Environmental Leader</a>, <a href="http://www.ag.ny.gov/media_center/2011/mar/10-17_%20bs.pdf" target="_blank">NY Attorney General’s Brief</a>, <a href="http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2011/03/nj_withdraws_from_multi-state.html" target="_blank">NJ.com</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="461"><strong><a name="4">Virginia Supreme Court to Hear State Attorney General’s Appeal in Climate Fraud Case</a></strong></p>
<p align="left">On March 4, the Supreme Court of Virginia agreed to hear the appeal of Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli on the case against the climatologist, Dr. Michael Mann, whom he accused of fraud. In April 2010, Mr. Cuccinelli demanded that the University of Virginia supply him vast numbers of academic documents regarding Dr. Mann’s work, including emails, computer programs and data, and others. Mr. Cuccinelli has accused Dr. Mann, now a professor at Penn State, with defrauding the state of hundreds of thousands of dollars by providing false information and records in his research grant applications. Last August a state judge ruled against Mr. Cuccinelli, because he had failed to provide any evidence. Mr. Cuccinelli appealed the decision, and now the Virginia Supreme Court will hear the case.</p>
<p align="center">For additional information see: <a href="http://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/03/12/hearing-is-set-in-climate-fraud-case/?partner=rss&amp;emc=rss" target="_blank">NY Times</a>, <a href="http://www.courts.state.va.us/courts/scv/appeals/102359.html" target="_blank">Virginia Supreme Court</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="461"><strong><a name="5">Carbon Credits Rise as Germany Prepares to Close Older Reactors for Safety Review</a></strong></p>
<p align="left">On March 15, carbon credits rose to 17 euros after German Chancellor Angela Merkel confirmed that several older reactors in Germany will shut down temporarily for a three month moratorium. Merkel ordered seven reactors, all brought online before 1980, to close to conduct a sweeping safety review in the midst of the growing crises at several Japanese reactors following the 9.0 earthquake and tsunami on March 11. The carbon price spike was fueled by carbon traders who speculated that coal and natural gas will meet most of the unmet demand. According to industry analysts, energy and industrial firms currently hold a surplus of emissions allowances as a result of the economic recession, but a lengthier nuclear shutdown could eat into the surplus.</p>
<p align="center">For additional information see:  <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/16/us-nuclear-warming-idUSTRE72F5LO20110316" target="_blank">Reuters</a>, <a href="http://www.businessgreen.com/bg/news/2034119/carbon-price-breaks-eur17-mark-germany-shuts-nuclear-plants" target="_blank">Business Green</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="461"><strong><a name="6">EU Sets Auction Amount for 2013 Emissions Allowances </a></strong></p>
<p align="left">On March 15, the European Commission Director General for Climate, Jos Debelke, announced plans to auction 120 million carbon allowances for the next phase of the European Union’s cap and trade program. &#8220;Stakeholders have expressed a strong preference to have the early auction volume fixed now as this gives market actors time to adapt to the chosen level,&#8221; Jos Delbeke acknowledged. Set to begin in 2013, the European emissions trading scheme will enter its third phase and begin to ratchet down the number of emission allowances it distributes to 11,000 installations for free. Instead, companies subject to the program will have to purchase more allowances at auction to cover their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In addition to the 120 million allowances, the European Investment Bank intends to sell 300 million allowances by the end of 2012 as part of its NER300 demonstration program to raise funds for low carbon projects./p&gt;</p>
<p align="center">For additional information see: <a href="http://www.businessgreen.com/bg/news/2034129/eu-proposes-2012-auction-120-million-carbon-allowances" target="_blank">Business Green</a>, <a href="http://ec.europa.eu/clima/news/index_en.htm" target="_blank">European Commission</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="461"><strong><a name="7">Automobile Emissions in UK Drop 3.5 Percent in 2010</a></strong></p>
<p align="left">On March 16, a report released by the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT) found that the 2010 average carbon emissions for new cars in the United Kingdom fell 3.5 percent as compared to carbon emissions in 2009. The “New Car CO2 Report” also found that 40 percent of new cars average emissions below 130g/km, the 2015 targeted EU fuel efficiency standards for new vehicles. “New technology has delivered impressive reductions in CO2 emissions, but coordinated action, to support research and development, new infrastructure and consumer incentives, is critical to securing significant future advances.” said SMMT&#8217;s chief executive Paul Everitt. The report stated that 56 percent of new cars have a CO2 emission level of 140g/km or less, compared to 10 years ago, when the average new car in the United Kingdom was well over the 140g/km CO2 emissions level.</p>
<p align="center">For additional information see: <a href="http://www.businessgreen.com/bg/news/2034482/uk-car-emissions-drop-35-cent-iun-2010" target="_blank">Business Green</a>, <a href="https://www.smmt.co.uk/shop/new-car-co2-report-mar-2011/" target="_blank">Report</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="461"><strong><a name="8">Study Reveals Pre-Historic Global Warming More Common Than Previously Thought</a></strong></p>
<p align="left">On March 17, a study published in the journal Nature found that rapid climate change occurred on Earth much more frequently than previously thought, with limited biological impact at the time. A team led by the Scripps Institution of Oceanography analyzed sea floor sediments to see how climate change affected marine ecosystems during four short periods of intense warming in the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum&#8211;a transition period between two geologic epochs 65 to 33 million years ago, in which global temperatures rose 7.2-12.6 degrees Fahrenheit. Researchers attributed the rapid global warming events to different feedback mechanisms, such as a substantial release of carbon from the ocean. Scripps geologist and study co-author Richard Norris noted that the research discovered more periods of intense warming and, that despite significant global change, biological effects seemed modest. While Norris pointed out there were differences between then and now, indicating that the earth’s surface has been massively restructured, making it harder for species to relocate en masse, reaction to the findings in the scientific community included several remarks about comparisons to human-induced climate change. Current ecosystems, including human beings, were not around back then, noted Gavin Schmidt, of NASA&#8217;s Goddard Institute for Space Studies. “So, while interesting from an intellectual standpoint, this new information is not going to change how &#8216;scientists&#8217; think about climate change.&#8221;</p>
<p align="center">For additional information see: <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/03/110316152941.htm" target="_blank">Science Daily</a>, <a href="http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2011/mar/16/scripps-earth-use-dealing-abrupt-climate-change/" target="_blank">San Diego Union-Tribune</a>, <a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v471/n7338/full/nature09826.html" target="_blank">Abstract</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="461"><strong><a name="9">Researchers Show New More Accurate Carbon-Mapping Technique</a></strong></p>
<p align="left">On March 15, a study published in the journal Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment reported a new method to more accurately assess carbon stored in Hawaii’s forests. A team from the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Carnegie Institution for Science&#8217;s Department of Global Ecology developed a 30-meter resolution map of the above ground carbon density of the island of Hawaii, spanning 40 vegetation types, by combining field measurements, airborne Light Detection And Ranging (LiDAR)-based observations, and satellite-based imagery. The estimated total of 28.3 million tons of carbon was 56 percent lower than the estimate of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. However, the latter assessment was not intended to resolve carbon variation on so fine a scale. Researchers noted that the new approach represented a fourfold decrease in the regional costs of carbon management over using field samples only. &#8220;We are very excited about the prospects of applying this new approach to other regions of the world to facilitate faster and more accurate forest carbon assessments. It is a true leap forward in understanding the state and dynamics of the world&#8217;s forests,&#8221; said Dr. R. Flint Hughes, an ecologist and co-author of the study.</p>
<p align="center">For additional information see:  <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/03/110314172329.htm" target="_blank">Science Daily</a>, <a href="http://www.fs.fed.us/psw/news/2011/110314_carbon_mapping.shtml" target="_blank">Press Release</a>, <a href="http://www.fs.fed.us/psw/publications/hughes/psw_2011_hughes%28asner%29001.pdf" target="_blank">Study</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="461"><strong><a name="10">Plasticity of Plants Helps Them Adapt to Climate Change</a></strong></p>
<p align="left">On March 17, an international study published in Trends in Plant Science found that the phenotypic plasticity of plants enables them to adapt to climate change. Researchers reviewed plants’ molecular and genetic mechanisms which showed that plants have “the capacity to adapt to a changing environment without requiring any evolutionary changes,” according to Fernando Valladares, co-author of the paper. Scientists used various indicators to study the plasticity of the plants, including pigmentation, root length, and leaf mass. Valladares stated that &#8220;various studies suggest that species from more heterogeneous and changing environments have greater degrees of plasticity. For example, plants from these environments have great root plasticity in order to be able to take better advantage of fertile and damp areas and to avoid sterile, dry ones&#8221;. He continues, &#8220;The differences in plasticity and its mechanisms allow us to better understand why various plant species grow where they do. This will enable us to project their most likely ranges in climate change scenarios.”</p>
<p align="center">For additional information see: <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/03/110316084909.htm" target="_blank">Science Daily</a>, <a href="http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2011-03/f-sf-pop031611.php" target="_blank">EurekAlert</a>, <a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&amp;_udi=B6TD1-5192X3H-1&amp;_user=10&amp;_coverDate=12%2F31%2F2010&amp;_rdoc=1&amp;_fmt=high&amp;_orig=gateway&amp;_origin=gateway&amp;_sort=d&amp;_docanchor=&amp;view=c&amp;_acct=C000050221&amp;_version=1&amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;_userid=10&amp;md5=58980c266285808d55c41f894b06a27a&amp;searchtype=a" target="_blank">Abstract</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="461"><strong><a name="11">NASA Study Finds Relationship between Earth’s Core and Climate Change</a></strong></p>
<p align="left">On March 11, a study published in The Journal of Climate found new evidence of the relationship between movements in the Earth’s core, rotation, and atmospheric temperature change. According to researchers at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), the link between the three variables and the effect each has on the length of Earth’s day has been established for some time. In addition to finding a correlation between long-term variations in temperature to long-term variations in the length of day, researchers also found how much core variations affect the length of day over various time periods. Scientists used two sets of global surface temperature data from NASA’s Goddard Institute and the UK’s Met Office since the 1880’s and compared it to existing models of the fluid movements of the Earth’s core and recorded changes to the length of day. They then subtracted human-produced temperature changes to create a “corrected” temperature record and found that the Earth’s core effect on climate is substantially smaller than human effects. Data showed that since 1930, global temperature began to rise without corresponding changes to other variables. &#8220;It&#8217;s just a wiggle on top of what ever else is going on,&#8221; said JPL&#8217;s Steve Marcus, a co-author of the study. &#8220;It&#8217;s just an added variability on top of these larger trends we&#8217;ve observed in climate over the last century or so, when human global warming has certainly been kicking in.&#8221;</p>
<p align="center">For additional information see: <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/03/110311140706.htm" target="_blank">Science Daily</a>, <a href="http://www.pasadenastarnews.com/news/ci_17603445" target="_blank">Pasadena Star News</a>, <a href="http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/2010JCLI3500.1" target="_blank">Abstract</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="461"><strong><a name="12">Septic Tank Emissions Found to be Half of Previous Estimates</a></strong></p>
<p align="left">Researchers at the University of California, Davis have determined the greenhouse gas emissions of septic tanks to be approximately half as high as previously estimated. The waste sent to septic tanks is broken down by microorganisms that then produce methane, carbon dioxide, and nitrous oxide – all of which contribute to the warming of the atmosphere. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change estimates that an average septic tank emits 0.23 metric tons of carbon dioxide-equivalent per tank per year, but this new research indicates that annual per-tank emissions are between 0.10 and 0.12 metric tons. Approximately 20 percent of the U.S. population uses septic tanks in their homes.</p>
<p align="center">For additional information see:  <a href="http://pubs.acs.org/cen/news/89/i12/8912scene2.html" target="_blank">Chemical and Engineering News</a>, <a href="http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es1036095" target="_blank">Abstract</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="461"><strong><a name="13">Northern Peatlands Contributed Less Methane at End of Ice Age than Thought</a></strong></p>
<p align="left">Northern peatlands did not play as large a role as previously thought in the warming of the atmosphere at the end of the last ice age, according to research conducted by PhD students at the University of Alberta and published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Northern peatlands, the largest of which occur in subarctic regions of Canada and Russia, are a boggy mixture of dead organic material and water. Covering more than four million square kilometers, they sequester carbon dioxide from the atmosphere as they grow and emit methane – a greenhouse gas many times more powerful than carbon dioxide – as old peat is buried and decomposes. Scientists had previously believed that northern peatlands were a principal source of the increase in atmospheric methane 10,000 years ago, but a comparison of radiocarbon dates of ancient peatlands with ice-core records showed that peatlands did not colonize the north until 500-1000 years after the dramatic increase in methane. These results imply that tropical wetlands were instead the likely cause of the initial rises in methane levels at the end of the last ice age.</p>
<p align="center">For additional information see: <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/03/110315130108.htm" target="_blank">Science Daily</a>, <a href="http://www.expressnews.ualberta.ca/en/NewsArticles/2011/03/Northernpeatlandsamisunderstoodplayerinclimatechange.aspx" target="_blank">Press Release</a>, <a href="http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2011/02/15/1013270108.abstract" target="_blank">Abstract</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p align="left"><strong><a name="20">Other Headlines</a></strong></p>
<div>
<ul>
<div>
<li><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=mexico-lead-proving-carbon-cuts" target="_blank">Can Mexico Lead the Way in Proving Carbon Cuts?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.thenews.com.pk/TodaysPrintDetail.aspx?ID=36532&amp;Cat=4&amp;dt=3/17/2011" target="_blank">The Refugees of Climate Change</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-03-14/eu-may-need-tighter-supply-to-avoid-co2-slump-adviser-says-1-.html" target="_blank">EU May Need Tighter Supply to Avoid CO2 Price Slump</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.montrealgazette.com/business/Montreal+climate+change/4435598/story.html" target="_blank">Montreal to Get $1.8 Million for Climate Change</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/03/110315142742.htm" target="_blank">Wheels Up for NASA Mission&#8217;s Most Extensive Arctic Ice Survey</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/03/110317131207.htm" target="_blank">Intervention Offers &#8216;Best Chance&#8217; to Save Species Endangered by Climate Change, Expert Argues</a></li>
</div>
</ul>
</div>
<ul></ul>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="461">
<strong><a name="18"><br />
April 6: Hydropower in America: Energy Generation and Job Potential</a></strong></p>
<p align="left">The Environmental and Energy Study Institute (EESI) invites you to a briefing on hydropower. The event will be held from 3:00-4:30 p.m., April 6, at the Rayburn House Office Building, Room 2322. It is free and open to the public. For more information contact Laura Parsons at lparsons[at]eesi.org or 202-662-1884.</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>Writers: Matthew Johnson, Alison Alford, Laura Parsons<br />
</strong></p>
<p>Please distribute <em>Climate Change News</em> to your colleagues.    Permission for reproduction of this newsletter is granted provided that   the Environmental and Energy Study Institute is properly acknowledged as   the source.  Past issues are available <a href="http://www.eesi.org/ccn" target="_blank">here</a>.  Free email subscriptions are available <a href="http://visitor.constantcontact.com/email.jsp?m=1101500533487&amp;p=oi" target="_blank">here</a>.  We welcome your <a href="http://www.eesi.org/contact" target="_blank">suggestions, comments, and questions</a>.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>The Environmental and Energy Study Institute (EESI) is a non-profit organization founded in 1984 by a bipartisan Congressional caucus dedicated to finding innovative environmental and energy solutions.  EESI works to protect the climate and ensure a healthy, secure, and sustainable future for America through policymaker education, coalition building, and policy development in the areas of energy efficiency, renewable energy, agriculture, forestry, transportation, buildings, and urban planning.<br />
</strong><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong><a href="https://secure.groundspring.org/dn/index.php?aid=480"><img class="image image-_original" src="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/donate.jpg" alt="" width="90" height="39" /></a></strong></p>
<p><strong></p>
<p>EESI&#8217;s work, including this free newsletter, is made possible by financial support from people like you. Please help us continue to make it available by making a secure, online donation today by clicking <a href="https://secure.groundspring.org/dn/index.php?aid=480">here</a> or mailing a check to Environmental and Energy Study Institute; 1112 16th St NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20036. Please contact Susan Williams at (202) 662-1887<span class="skype_pnh_container" dir="ltr"><span class="skype_pnh_highlighting_inactive_common" title="Call this phone number in United States of America with Skype: +12026621887" dir="ltr"><span class="skype_pnh_textarea_span"><span class="skype_pnh_text_span"> (202) 662-1887</span></span><span class="skype_pnh_right_span"> or s</span></span></span>ee <a href="http://www.eesi.org/donate">www.eesi.org/donate</a> to find out more. Thank you for your support!</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="lsidebar" style="background-color: #FFFFFF;     padding: 10px;" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<hr />
<p>Climate Action Hotline is the new weekly update by the US Climate Action Network. <a class="lsidebar" style="background-color: #FFFFFF;" href="http://bit.ly/climateactionfeedback">Let us know what you think</a>.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
<td width="246" valign="top" bgcolor="#ebebeb">
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><img src="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/images/email/cah-member-blogs/" alt="Headlines" width="246" height="33" /></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="rsidebar" style="background-color:#EBEBEB;" valign="top">
<ul>
<li><a href="http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/rkistner/oil_spill_reported_near_deepwa.html" target="_blank">Oil  Spill Reported Near Deepwater Drilling Site in Gulf</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://sierraclub.typepad.com/carlpope/2011/03/what-have-they-done-to-the-rain.html" target="_blank">What  Have They Done to the Rain?</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.actgreen.com/2011/03/google-launches-new-media-climate.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+lcv_actgreen+%28Act+Green%29" target="_blank">Google  Launches New Media Climate Campaign</a></li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><img src="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/images/email/ca_email_headlines.jpg" alt="Headlines" width="246" height="33" /></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="rsidebar" style="background-color:#EBEBEB;" valign="top">
<ul>
<li> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/18/science/earth/18scientists.html?ref=science" target="_blank">With  U.S. Nuclear Plants Under Scrutiny, Too, a Report Raises Safety Concerns</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/18/idUS283138026420110318" target="_blank">New  Senate Bill Contains 25 Percent Renewable Energy Standard</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2011/03/16/16greenwire-pair-of-bills-from-gop-dems-seek-to-spur-oil-a-23190.html?pagewanted=1" target="_blank">Pair  of Bills From GOP, Democrats Seek to Spur Oil and Gas Drilling</a></li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="background-color:#EBEBEB;" valign="top"><img src="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/ca_email_international.jpg" alt="International Articles" width="246" height="33" /></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="rsidebar" style="background-color:#EBEBEB;" valign="top">
<ul>
<li> <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/mar/17/wind-cheaper-nuclear-eu-climate" target="_blank">Wind  Power Cheaper Than Nuclear, Says EU Climate Chief</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.azdailysun.com/news/opinion/columnists/article_4463efa7-f46c-5528-ab9b-a36e6a7f8ef8.html" target="_blank">Climate  Change, Food Safety Linked</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.trust.org/alertnet/news/africa-anxious-eyes-on-green-climate-fund" target="_blank">Africa:  Anxious Eyes on Green Climate Fund</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=mexico-lead-proving-carbon-cuts" target="_blank">Can  Mexico Lead the Way in Proving Carbon Cuts?</a></li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><img src="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/images/email/ca_email_coverage.jpg" alt="Special Coverage" width="246" height="33" /></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="rsidebar" style="background-color: #EBEBEB;padding: 10px;"><a href="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/2011-calendar"><img src="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/intlcalendar2011_blogsidebar.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="226" height="183" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/category/clean-air-act-digest/"><img src="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/CAA_digesthotline.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="226" height="121" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/policy/the-clean-air-act"><img src="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/CAA_hotline.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="226" height="121" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/"><img src="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/images/email/cah_climateactionhotline.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="226" height="109" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/category/hot-pubs/"><img src="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/hotpubs_hotline.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="226" height="70" /></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><img src="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/images/email/ca_email_video.jpg" alt="Video Of The Week" width="246" height="33" /></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AiyiWmdXLmw"><img src="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/vidofweek_mar21.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="246" height="200" /></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><img src="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/images/email/ca_email_quote.jpg" alt="Quote Of The Week" width="246" height="33" /></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="text" style="background-color: #EBEBEB;padding: 10px;" valign="top"><em><strong>&#8220;Dirty air makes children sick. That&#8217;s the long and short of it.  If you   think it&#8217;s an expensive process to put a scrubber on a smokestack, you   should see how much it costs over a lifetime to treat a child with a   preventable birth defect.&#8221;</strong></em></p>
<p>–   Marian Burton, President of the American Academy of Pediatrics</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.usclimatenetwork.org%2Fhotline%2Fclimate-action-hotline-3-21-11%2F&amp;title=Climate%20Action%20Hotline%2C%203.21.11" id="wpa2a_6"><img src="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p><p>Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hotline/climate-action-hotline-4-4-11/' rel='bookmark' title='Climate Action Hotline, 4.4.11'>Climate Action Hotline, 4.4.11</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hotline/the-epa-is-under-siege-but-support-for-public-health-is-holding-strong-climate-action-hotline-2-7-11/' rel='bookmark' title='The EPA Is Under Siege but Support for Public Health Is Holding Strong, Climate Action Hotline 2.7.11'>The EPA Is Under Siege but Support for Public Health Is Holding Strong, Climate Action Hotline 2.7.11</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hotline/rising-up-climate-action-network-4-18-11/' rel='bookmark' title='Rising up, Climate Action Hotline 4.18.11'>Rising up, Climate Action Hotline 4.18.11</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hotline/climate-action-hotline-3-21-11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Imagine a World Where Politicians Get it About Climate, Climate Action Hotline 3.7.11</title>
		<link>http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hotline/2485/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hotline/2485/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 19:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>USCAN</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hotline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean air act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate denier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/?p=2485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter Bahouth, Executive Director March 7, 2011 Imagine a World Where Politicians Get it About Climate Frank Luntz, a Republican pollster, has a new book out that offers 11 of the most powerful words and phrases for the political mood of 2011.  Just for fun, let’s look at the current events on climate with a [...]
Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hotline/climate-action-hotline-3-21-11/' rel='bookmark' title='Climate Action Hotline, 3.21.11'>Climate Action Hotline, 3.21.11</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hotline/ahead-of-the-election-signs-of-hope-and-caution-for-climate-activists-climate-action-hotline-10-26-10/' rel='bookmark' title='Ahead of the Election, Signs of Hope and Caution For Climate Activists, Climate Action Hotline 10.26.10'>Ahead of the Election, Signs of Hope and Caution For Climate Activists, Climate Action Hotline 10.26.10</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hotline/2263/' rel='bookmark' title='Climate Action Hotline, 11.29.10'>Climate Action Hotline, 11.29.10</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="741" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="emailcontainer" style="border: 8px solid #2C6A9C;padding-top: 0px;padding-right: 0px;padding-bottom: 0px;padding-left: 0px;" width="757" valign="top">
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="741">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="emailheader" style="padding:0;" colspan="2"><a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/0b78e817ff/utm_content=mrisalvato%40climatenetwork.org&amp;utm_source=VerticalResponse&amp;utm_medium=Email&amp;utm_term=&amp;utm_campaign=Climate%20Action%20Hotline%2C%20Mar%2E%207"><img src="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/images/email/ca_email_header.jpg" border="0" alt="US Climate Action Network" width="741" height="85" /></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="495" valign="top">
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="feature" style="padding:10px;text-align: left;background-color: #96C3DA;line-height: 16px;" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:14px;"><strong>Peter Bahouth, Executive Director<br />
March 7, 2011 </strong></p>
<p><strong>Imagine a World Where Politicians Get it About Climate</strong></p>
<table border="0" align="right">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<table border="0" align="right">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><img src="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/flood_feature.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="226" height="183" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Frank Luntz, a Republican pollster, has a new book out that offers 11 of the  most powerful words and phrases for the political mood of 2011.  Just for fun, let’s look at the current events  on climate with a few of these potentially powerful phrases.</p>
<p><strong>&#8220;Imagine&#8221; a world where climate change is treated as a reality</strong>,  not a theory.  In Uganda, they have no  doubt that climate change is real.  Eighty  percent of Ugandans are farmers dealing with erratic and unpredictable rainfall.  Their reaction is not anger at the nations whose pollution is largely  responsible for global warming. Instead, the national conversation focuses on  the ways to make their environment as resilient as possible. Adam Corner’s  article in <em>New Science</em> magazine  suggests that perhaps a more pragmatic framing of the issue “would deflect the  more hysterical objections of climate skeptics &#8211; but also allow climate change  to break out of the eco-warrior niche that it frustratingly still occupies.”</p>
<p><strong>&#8220;No excuses.&#8221;</strong> Activists  around the globe took this message to the World Bank last week – and got an  immediate response.  Despite the Banks’s pro-poor, pro-climate rhetoric, the  World Bank&#8217;s fossil fuel lending has increased <a title="World Bank Energy Fact Sheet" href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/7862b1324a/docID=6561" target="_blank">400% since 2006</a>.  Within hours of the launch of the on-line  campaign, the Bank responded with its own tweet:  &#8220;<em>@Sierra_Club @oxfam @Tcktcktck  @foe_us <strong>We&#8217;re listening. Draft energy  strategy ready for review &amp; comments in late April.</strong></em>The new Energy Strategy under development could  revolutionize the energy investments in the developing world if it is ambitious  enough to truly break the addition to coal and oil.</p>
<p><strong>&#8220;The simple  truth&#8221; is that a cleaner environment saves lives and makes America more  productive</strong>.    The EPA released a report showing that reducing  air pollution prevented more than 100,000 premature  deaths and heart attacks, over a million asthma attacks, and tens of millions  lost work days.  Those health benefits do  not come at the cost of jobs.  Dale Jorgenson,  a Harvard University economist, says environmental regulation doesn&#8217;t have a  big impact on the economy or jobs. He believes that spokespeople for coal and  other industries reliant on fossil fuels &#8220;are simply presenting a point of  view intended to affect legislation&#8230; they are coming up with stories about huge  job losses they think will resonate. I wouldn&#8217;t say there is any academically  respectable support for that view.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>&#8220;I get it.&#8221; </strong> As the influence of Koch Industries on the GOP  and the state of Wisconsin emerges, the attempts to gut clean air laws will  hopefully be revealed simply as payback to a powerful and profit-motivated  contributor. CEOs of major energy companies on the Hill last week said they support allowing the EPA to proceed on  a “reasonable” time frame on greenhouse gas rules for power plants, petroleum  refiners and other major stationary sources. While some called Senator Inhofe’s  and Congressman Upton’s bills to permanently block the EPA’s ability to  regulate carbon pollution “a bit strong,” many CEOs did call for delay of the  EPA’s greenhouse gas rules that would slow investment in clean energy and cost  lives in the U.S. and around the globe.</p>
<p><strong>&#8220;Let&#8217;s get to work&#8221;</strong> <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/ba6cc73b91/utm_content=mrisalvato%40climatenetwork.org&amp;utm_source=VerticalResponse&amp;utm_medium=Email&amp;utm_term=USCAN%E2%80%99s%20Clean%20Air%20Digest&amp;utm_campaign=Climate%20Action%20Hotline%2C%20Mar%2E%207" target="_blank">USCAN’s  Clean Air Digest</a> provides you with the latest information on the battle to  protect America’s clean air laws  - the  best weapon currently on the books to fight global warming. We hope you will  rally behind a letter urging Congress to promote protective clean air standards  and to oppose any measures to weaken protections for public health. Let’s reach  out to U.S. groups large and small, from all walks of life, from neighborhood  associations to national civic organizations.   Let’s demonstrate to Congress that <strong><em>America gets it</em></strong> – and won’t stand  for cynical attempts to trade public health and the environment for political  gain.</p>
<p>Angela Anderson, Program Director</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="lsidebar" style="background-color: #FFFFFF; padding: 10px;" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><img src="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/images/email/ca_email_actionalert.gif" alt="Action Alert" width="475" height="32" /></p>
<p><strong>Tell the EPA You Support Its Efforts to Curb Carbon Pollution!</strong></p>
<p>Recently,  the EPA hosted a series of listening sessions to gather stakeholder input on  the design of the upcoming New Source Performance Standards for power plants  and refineries. These standards, targeting the two largest industrial sources  of pollution, would place the first ever limits on greenhouse gas pollutants  from these sectors. While we want to applaud the EPA for taking this flagship  action and announcing a reasonable timeline for the issuance of these  standards, we also want to encourage them to continue working as swiftly as  possible to issue standards that will meaningfully reduce pollution from the  largest industrial sources.</p>
<p>Tell the EPA  you support their efforts to protect our families from carbon pollution today!  See the Sierra Club’s <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/1fbc776e1d/em_id=197925.0&amp;dlv_id=170003" target="_blank">action alert</a>, <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/1697314873/utm_content=mrisalvato%40climatenetwork.org&amp;utm_source=VerticalResponse&amp;utm_medium=Email&amp;utm_term=comment%20card%20template&amp;utm_campaign=Climate%20Action%20Hotline%2C%20Mar%2E%207" target="_blank">comment card template</a> or contact Kate Smolski at <a href="mailto:ksmolski@climatenetwork.org">ksmolski@climatenetwork.org</a> for  more information.</p>
<p>EPA will accept written comments on the planned rulemakings until <strong>March 18, 2011</strong>. You  can also <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/2ac89ecd43" target="_blank">click here for the official instructions on submitting comments</a>.  Please note that there will be an official comment period on the rules once  proposed.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="lsidebar" style="background-color: #FFFFFF; padding: 10px;" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><img src="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/eesi.jpg" alt="EESI" width="475" height="105" /></p>
<h3>Carol Werner, Executive Director<br />
March 7, 2011</h3>
<h3>News</h3>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/d4d5ef428e/scp=1&amp;sq=inhofe" target="_blank">Upton and Inhofe File Bill to Permanently Block EPA from Regulating GHGs</a></li>
<li><a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/8446712638/NewsID=8286" target="_blank">Energy &amp; Power Subcommittee Examines Impact of EPA&#8217;s GHG Regulations on Jobs</a></li>
<li><a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/2addbb006f">RGGI Member States Invest $404 Million In Efficiency</a></li>
<li><a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/18a93df59f" target="_blank">EPA Extends Deadline for Reporting GHG Emissions to Late Summer</a></li>
<li><a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/7b76f2cd25" target="_blank">Inquiry Exonerates NOAA from “Climategate” Email Scandal</a></li>
<li><a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/f0855bf6a4" target="_blank">Water Demand to Exceed Supply 40% by 2030, More Flooding Expected</a></li>
<li><a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/5a50d4b660" target="_blank">Survey: Half of European Heavy Polluters Cut Emissions Due to Cap and Trade Scheme</a></li>
<li><a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/d585daabd7/title=House body OK’s incentives bill for climate change aid&amp;id=27119" target="_blank">Philippine Government Considers “People’s Survival Fund” Bill for Climate Change Aid</a></li>
<li><a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/df6a0b1f22/partner=rss&amp;emc=rss" target="_blank">China’s Environmental Minister Issues Warning on Economic Development and Climate</a></li>
<li><a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/354a6942d2">BASIC Countries Discuss Priorities for Next Climate Summit in Durban</a></li>
<li><a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/2076acc986/NewsID=37658&amp;Cr=climate+change&amp;Cr1=" target="_blank">UN Climate Chief Urges Nations to Implement Cancún Agreements Before Durban</a></li>
<li><a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/aca80318c8" target="_blank">Climate Change Threatening Survival of Lodgepole Pine in Pacific Northwest </a></li>
<li><a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/713672ef35/partner=rss&amp;emc=rss" target="_blank">Southwest U.S. Could Face a “Megadrought” Due to Rising GHG Emissions</a></li>
<li><a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/727b4a820e" target="_blank">Drier Conditions Reduce Vegetation, Could Accelerate Dust Storms in Southwest</a></li>
<li><a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/8a028afd34" target="_blank">Ancient Catastrophic Drought Shows How Severe Climate Change Can Become</a></li>
<li><a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/116ed2cfb2" target="_blank">Arctic Algae Blooms Occurring Earlier, Impact on Carbon Cycling Unknown</a></li>
<li><a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/7137733eb0" target="_blank">Climate Change Could Make “Tree of Life” Slimmer in Europe</a></li>
<li><a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/7441e17265/id=4371708" target="_blank">World’s Sixth Mass Extinction Could Already Be Underway</a></li>
<li><a class="anchor-link" href="#1">Other Headlines</a></li>
</ul>
<h3>Events</h3>
<ul>
<li><a class="anchor-link" href="#2">March 9: The Canadian Boreal Forest Agreement: A New Model for Balancing Resource Use and Conservation</a></li>
<li><a class="anchor-link" href="#3">March 16: Natural Gas as a Transportation Fuel: Prospects and Challenges</a></li>
</ul>
<table border="1" cellspacing="2" width="471">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;" width="461"><strong><br />
Upton and Inhofe File Bill to Permanently Block EPA from Regulating GHGs</strong></p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p align="left">On March 3, Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK) and Rep. Fred Upton (R-MI) introduced legislation intended to block the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from regulating greenhouse gases (GHGs) from power plants, factories, and refineries. Named the “Energy Tax Prevention Act”, the companion bills, H.R. 910 and S. 482, have 9 co-sponsors in the House, including Democrats Nick Rahall (D-WV), Dan Boren (D-OK), and Collin Peterson (D-MN), and, in the Senate, 42 Republican co-sponsors as well as Joe Manchin (D-WV). The bill would allow many of the Clean Air Act programs to continue, but prevent the EPA from using its authority regulate carbon dioxide. A deal brokered with the automobile industry to limit GHGs from cars and light trucks would be allowed to continue until 2016, but not further. State-adopted GHG regulations would be allowed to continue. Rep. Upton is Chair of the House Energy and Commerce Committee. Sen. Inhofe is the ranking member of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.</p>
<p align="center">For additional information see: <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/9b2e8911a4/scp=1&amp;sq=inhofe upton bill&amp;st=cse" target="_blank">New York Times </a>, <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/1c2240ef11" target="_blank">Politico</a>, <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/caa82e958e" target="_blank">AP</a>, <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/dd8d41b1c2/d112:5:./temp/~bd9tqJ:@@@L&amp;summ2=m&amp;|/home/LegislativeData.php|" target="_blank">Bill Information</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;" width="461"><strong>House Subcommittee Examines Impact of EPA&#8217;s GHG Regulations on Jobs</strong></p>
<p align="left">On March 1, the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Energy and Power held a hearing on the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) greenhouse gas (GHG) regulations and their potential effects on American jobs. Business leaders, along with the Ohio Coal Association and the Industrial Energy Association of America, spoke on the first panel. They told the lawmakers that regulations have been onerous, and that they have stunted economic growth. All of the panelists, with the exception of Professor Dan Reicher from Stanford University, testified that the EPA’s efforts to regulate GHGs will accelerate the closing of coal-fired power plants, impose unnecessary and burdensome regulations on businesses of all sizes, and cost companies enormous sums of money. Reicher stated that controlling carbon emissions was critical to U.S. national security, economy, health, and environmental quality, and that well-designed environmental and energy regulation can enhance U.S. competitiveness, innovation, and cut costs. During the hearing, Rep. Ed Whitfield (R-KY) said he would schedule a hearing for March 8 on two new scientific studies linking climate change to severe weather, at the request of Committee Ranking Member Henry Waxman (D-CA) and Subcommittee Ranking Member Bobby Rush (D-IL).</p>
<p align="left">The second panel consisted of Gina McCarthy, Assistant EPA Administrator. McCarthy testified that even though individuals and businesses have said expanding regulations pose a threat to jobs, history has repeatedly shown that the United States can clean up pollution, create jobs, and grow its economy at the same time. McCarthy said the EPA has been identifying cost-effective ways for new companies to obtain emissions permits. In a report released before McCarthy testified, the EPA found that the Clean Air Act will have saved $2 trillion by 2020 and prevented at least 230,000 deaths annually.</p>
<p align="center">For additional information see:  <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/0a27c2cdc5/NewsID=8286" target="_blank">Energy and Power Subcommittee Press Release</a>, <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/971befbf4d" target="_blank">The Hill</a>, <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/b28fb387a3" target="_blank">Bloomberg</a>, <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/831f3a6a5c" target="_blank">Hearing Video</a>, <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/9b27d19139" target="_blank">EPA Report</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;" width="461"><strong>RGGI Member States Invest $404 Million In Efficiency</strong></p>
<p align="left">On February 28, member states of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), a greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction program, announced in a report that they have invested more than half their carbon permit auction proceeds, roughly $404 million, into energy efficiency. To meet its goal of a 10 percent reduction in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by 2018, the RGGI holds quarterly auctions of CO2 permits, which have raised nearly $780 million since 2008 despite a recent dip in auction prices to $2 a short ton. About 80 percent of the proceeds have gone to programs that cut energy demand, foster the growth of alternative energy, and help the poor pay energy bills, while 52 percent of the proceeds have gone specifically to programs to improve energy efficiency, such as replacing boilers and caulking windows in businesses and homes. The RGGI called the energy efficiency programs the most cost-effective tool for reducing GHG emissions.</p>
<p align="center">For additional information see: <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/f3c09dc047" target="_blank">Reuters</a>, <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/883113a25e RGGI_Proceeds_Report.pdf" target="_blank">RGGI Report Press Release</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;" width="461"><strong>EPA Extends Deadline for Reporting GHG Emissions to Late Summer</strong></p>
<p align="left">On March 1, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced that it was extending the deadline requiring thousands of businesses to report their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from March 31 to later this summer, after it establishes an online platform for companies to report their emissions. Once data are uploaded, the agency expects to publish them later this year. The EPA’s emissions reporting program was launched in 2009 to collect information on GHG pollution to inform future policy decisions, and it is one aspect of the EPA’s plan to roll out more regulations on GHG emissions. The EPA’s decision will result in a more accurate GHG database, said the National Petrochemical and Refiners Association, which welcomed the delay, along with the American Chemistry Council.</p>
<p align="center">For additional information see:  <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/8548fe8456" target="_blank">Reuters</a>, <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/c6f56901e0" target="_blank">EPA Press Release</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;" width="461"><strong>Inquiry Exonerates NOAA from “Climategate” Email Scandal</strong></p>
<p align="left">On February 24, an independent review of 1,073 leaked emails from climate scientists around the world, known as the 2009 “Climategate” controversy, found that scientists at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) did not manipulate climate change data or fail to adhere to appropriate peer review procedures. The report was conducted at the request of Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK) by Todd Zinser, the Inspector General of the Department of Commerce, under which NOAA operates. It is the latest in a series of investigations, all of which have exonerated the climate scientists. Previous investigations were conducted by the UK’s House of Commons, the National Research Council, and Pennsylvania State University. Climate change skeptics have cited the emails leaked from the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia in the UK, and contend that the correspondence showed that scientists were manipulating or withholding information about global warming and the role of human activity. “None of the investigations have found any evidence to question the ethics of our scientists or raise doubts about NOAA’s understanding of climate change science,” said Mary Glackin, NOAA’s deputy undersecretary for operations. Although the report found no evidence of scientific misconduct, it did criticize NOAA over its handling of some Freedom of Information Act requests in 2007.</p>
<p align="center">For additional information see: <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/fa50800544/partner=rss&amp;emc=rss" target="_blank">The Washington Post</a>, <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/8a3a93eb84/partner=rss&amp;emc=rss" target="_blank">The New York Times</a>, <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/a0f8c2b8f4/loc=interstitialskip" target="_blank">USA Today</a>, <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/f83b1da450" target="_blank">Office of the Inspector General</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;" width="461"><strong><br />
Water Demand to Exceed Supply 40% by 2030, More Flooding Expected</strong></p>
<p align="left">On March 1, research presented at the Canadian Water Network’s conference found that within 20 years, water demand will exceed supply by 40 percent. In flood-prone places, “once-in-a-century” catastrophic events can be expected every 20 years instead, due to the combined threats of climate change and population growth. Three hundred international scientists, policymakers, and economists attended the meetings and acknowledged the need to create technologies and services to find, manage, filter, disinfect and desalinate water; improve infrastructure and distribution; and reduce household, industry, and agricultural water consumption. Filling the gap between water demand and supply with supply-side measures only would require an estimated $200 billion per year, while an approach that both raises supply and lowers demand would require $50 to $60 billion per year, according to Margaret Catley-Carlson, a global authority on water issues. Nicholas Parker, Chairman of Cleantech Group, noted that institutional investors are increasingly looking ahead to the bottom-line impacts of a water-constrained world, asking businesses for data on their vulnerability to potential water supply difficulties. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) researcher Nicholas Ashbolt pointed out that conservation measures could reduce household demand in developed countries by 70 percent through water-saving innovations discussed at the meeting.</p>
<p align="left">In related news, an increase in extreme rainstorms brought on by climate change could result in the return of cholera to North America, said an expert who spoke at the Canadian Water Network’s annual conference. Microbiologist Rita Colwell and fellow expert Steve Hrudey noted that a breakdown in sewage treatment plants from severe weather patterns could raise the risk of cholera. Hrudey cited the need to better train and better pay individuals who manage Canadian municipal water systems. In Canada, the main problem lies in its patchwork of water management rules and regulations nationwide, while matching up natural units of water, such as watersheds, with political units poses additional concerns, noted Rob de Loe, a water expert from the University of Waterloo.</p>
<p align="center">For additional information see: <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/5b08bd58e6" target="_blank">Canadian Water Network</a>, <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/709d9befdb" target="_blank">CBC News</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;" width="461"><strong><br />
Survey: Half of European Heavy Polluters Cut Emissions Due to Cap and Trade Scheme</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<p align="left">On March 1, a survey, conducted by Point Carbon, of more than 2,500 European energy companies found that 59 percent of respondents have already reduced their emissions because of the European cap and trade system that put a price on carbon emissions. Another 9 percent said they plan to lower emissions due to the cost of carbon. Most of the reductions were only marginal, less than 5 percent, but the survey showed that the system introduced six years ago, has gained wider acceptance and has made a small dent in the pollution from big energy companies. Since the Emissions Trading Scheme’s (ETS’s) introduction, power companies have received their permits for free, but beginning in 2013 they will have to pay for their allocations in an auction with other companies. Overall carbon pollution has declined since 2005, despite a small increase in emissions last year. Europe is on target to meet its emissions reduction goal of 20 percent by 2020 from 1990 levels. Forty-nine percent of the companies that responded thought the trading scheme was the most cost-effective way for Europe to meet its emissions targets, up from 43 percent in 2010.</p>
<p align="center">For additional information see:  <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/2c93cc6b8d" target="_blank"> AP</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;" width="461"><strong>Philippine Government Considers “People’s Survival Fund” Bill for Climate Change Aid</strong></p>
<p align="left">On February 27, a Philippine House Committee on Ecology approved a bill that would create the People’s Survival Fund (PSF) for assisting local governments as they cope with climate change. Deputy Speaker of the Philippine Congress Lorenzo R. Tañada was the principal author of the bill that would incentivize early climate action by encouraging local governments to create adaptation plans and vulnerability assessments before they tap the PSF. A coalition of various organizations, including Oxfam and the Institute of Climate and Sustainable Cities, are working to persuade Congress to approve the bill as soon as possible. According to Congressman Tañada, the country’s response to natural disasters caused by climate change has been disorderly and costly, and the PSF bill would establish “long-term, predictable, and transparent” financial resources made available to vulnerable populations. Potential financial sources are cash dividends declared by all government-owned and controlled corporations, a portion of the Motor Vehicle User’s Charge, and a portion of emission units earned under the UN’s Clean Development Mechanism.</p>
<p align="center">For additional information see: <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/d7ae596c39/title=House body OK’s incentives bill for climate change aid&amp;id=27119" target="_blank">Business World</a>, <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/da2e269924" target="_blank">Thomson Reuters</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;" width="461"><strong><br />
China’s Environmental Minister Issues Warning on Economic Development and Climate</strong></p>
<p align="left">On February 28, China’s Environment Minister Zhou Shengxian issued a warning about the effects of unrestrained development on China’s air, water, and soil quality, saying that the nation’s current path could stifle long-term economic growth and fuel social instability. China has become the leading emitter of greenhouse gases (GHGs), due to its growth in energy consumption, its dependence on coal for 70 percent of its energy needs, and its increasing demand for oil. Mr. Zhou said the government will take a more aggressive role in determining whether development initiatives contribute to climate change through a new risk assessment system. Mr. Zhou’s comments were echoed by Prime Minister Wen Jiabao on the same day, who suggested that the nation would seek to embrace tighter environmental regulations this week. “We must not any longer sacrifice the environment for the sake of rapid growth and reckless roll-outs,” said Mr. Wen, who lowered China’s target for average GDP growth, from 7.5 percent to 7 percent, in a move that suggested China would reconsider emphasizing economic growth above all else.</p>
<p align="center">For additional information see: <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/0404ad7e50/partner=rss&amp;emc=rss" target="_blank">The New York Times</a>, <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/dceb49ee87" target="_blank">Reuters</a>, <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/8a1537e4c4" target="_blank">BBC</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;" width="461"><strong>BASIC Countries Discuss Priorities for Next Climate Summit in Durban</strong></p>
<p align="left">On February 27, at a meeting of the BASIC group of countries—Brazil, South Africa, India, and China—ministers from the four countries expressed the need for specific issues to be addressed before the upcoming December climate talks in Durban, South Africa. At the conclusion of the meeting in New Dehli, India, representatives said the agreements made at the 2010 Cancún climate talks could not be a complete substitute for the decisions made during the 2007 climate change conference in Bali. According to Indian Environment Minister Jairam Ramesh, there were several issues of equity, intellectual property rights, and trade in the “Bali Road Map” that were not included in the Cancún agreements. The BASIC countries want to see them addressed in Durban. Ramesh also pointed out that even though the United States and other participants in the 2009 Copenhagen Accord had agreed to raise $30 billion to aid poor and developing countries at risk of climate change disasters, they have so far failed to deliver these “fast track” financial obligations. Ramesh said only a negligible amount of the promised money has been delivered, and further inaction could lead to a suspicious atmosphere in Durban. The ministers said that a commitment period for the Kyoto Protocol, a commitment review mechanism for developed and developing countries, and strong emission reduction targets for the developed world were also necessary for an agreement at Durban.</p>
<p align="center">For additional information see: <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/d730b73cc6" target="_blank">Sify News</a>, <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/caebfe43fd" target="_blank">United Press International</a>, <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/5506033dda" target="_blank">Hindustan Times</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;" width="461"><strong>UN Climate Chief Urges Nations to Implement Cancún Agreements Before Durban</strong></p>
<p align="left">On March 1, UN Climate Change Chief Christiana Figueres called on world governments to quickly implement the agreements reached at the 2010 Cancún climate summit and provide clarity on the future of the Kyoto Protocol on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. She warned that the future of the global carbon market could be in thrown into doubt unless the upcoming climate talks in Durban, South Africa, produce an agreement on how to replace or extend the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol, which ends in 2012. Figueres described the Cancún talks as a solid step forward for strengthened global climate action, and praised the conference for forming the most comprehensive package ever decided by governments to help developing countries deal with climate change, and for deciding on a long-term agreement to keep average global temperatures below 2 degrees Celsius compared to pre-Industrial Age levels. However, Figueres noted that current emissions reductions promised by governments are only 60 percent of what the scientific community says is required by 2020. She instructed governments to agree on a way to cut global emissions about twice as quickly as they have already promised, and to keep in mind that the Kyoto Protocol remains the only working, binding international model to reduce emissions.</p>
<p align="center">For additional information see: <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/094d348b54/NewsID=37658&amp;Cr=climate+change&amp;Cr1=" target="_blank">UN News Centre</a>, <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/3916078e36" target="_blank">United Press International</a>, <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/56ecac2dca" target="_blank">Business Green</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;" width="461"><strong><br />
Climate Change Threatening Survival of Lodgepole Pine in Pacific Northwest</strong></p>
<p align="left">On February 28, a study published in the journal Climatic Change found that the range of the lodgepole pine tree is shrinking as a result of climate change, and could disappear from most of the Pacific Northwest by 2080. Warming temperatures, less winter precipitation, earlier loss of snowpack, and more summer drought appear to be affecting the range of the lodgepole pine, while simultaneously attracting bark beetles that attack the tree species. The lodgepole pine thrives in cold temperatures and plays a key role in many ecosystems in western North America, but scientists predict that the tree will only be able to survive in 17 percent of its current habitable range. The pine can occupy vast areas following major fires where extreme cold temperatures, poor soils, and branch-breaking snows make it difficult for other tree species to compete or survive. According to the study, climate change forces will have decreased the Pacific Northwest range of lodgepole pine by 8 percent by 2020, and by 2080, scientists predict that it will be almost absent from Oregon, Washington, and Idaho.</p>
<p align="center">For additional information see:  <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/fa7310bf49" target="_blank">EurekAlert</a>, <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/5bc364eeb4" target="_blank">The New York Times</a>, <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/06e5eb577b" target="_blank">Science Daily</a>, <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/2f5bb7c672" target="_blank">Oregon State University Press Release</a>, <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/9f4d23ba37" target="_blank">Study Abstract</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="461"><strong> </strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Southwest U.S. Could Face a “Megadrought” Due to Rising GHG Emissions</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p align="left">On March 1, a study published in the journal Nature found that rising global temperatures from increased concentrations of atmospheric greenhouse gases (GHGs) could lead the southwestern United States into a period of prolonged extreme drought seen only in ancient geological history. Researchers used a 270-foot core of sediments extracted from a dry lakebed in the Valles Caldera National Preserve to construct climatic conditions that prevailed between 360,000 and 550,000 years ago. Data from the lake sediment suggest that if the current epoch followed past trends, the Southwest would eventually enter a cooler, wetter phase in the absence of climate changes that are expected to arise from rising concentrations of heat-trapping GHGs. The sediment layers, which were bounded by distinct layers of volcanic ash, covered two interglacial periods, which represent times between ice ages when warmer temperatures mimicked present-day temperatures. The current Holocene Epoch is the most recent interglacial period. The projected warmth caused by GHGs increases the possibility of tipping the region into a “megadrought,” potentially lasting a millennium or more, according to lead researcher Peter Fawcett.</p>
<p align="center">For additional information see:  <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/3a5a49c6e3/partner=rss&amp;emc=rss" target="_blank">The New York Times</a>, <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/6be6307ba9" target="_blank">Science Daily</a>, <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/8376f1fed6" target="_blank">Study Abstract</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="461"><strong> </strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Drier Conditions Reduce Vegetation, Could Accelerate Dust Storms in Southwest</strong></p>
<p align="left">On February 28, a study published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences found that climate change is projected to result in drier conditions in the southwest United States that will likely reduce perennial vegetation cover and result in increased dust storm activity in the future. The researchers examined climate, vegetation, and soil data collected over a 20-year period in Arches and Canyonlands National Parks in Utah, then used these measurements in a model to project future wind erosion. According to scientists, accelerated rates of dust emission from wind erosion have significant implications for natural systems and human health. Dust carried by the wind has far-reaching effects, including the loss of nutrients and water-holding capacity from source landscapes, declines in agricultural productivity, and health and safety concerns. In addition, dust is a contributing factor in speeding up the melting of snowpack, which can subsequently affect the timing and magnitude of runoff into larger bodies of water.</p>
<p align="center">For additional information see: <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/4d0be61aa8" target="_blank">Science Daily</a>, <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/1897dab98d" target="_blank">Study Abstract</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="461"><strong> </strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Ancient Catastrophic Drought Shows How Severe Climate Change Can Become</strong></p>
<p align="left">On February 24, a study published in the journal Science found that climate change could become worse than anything recorded in written history. An international team of scientists compiled four dozen paleoclimate records from sediment cores extracted from several locations in Africa, which showed the occurrence of one of the most widespread and intense droughts of the last 50,000 years or more that struck Africa and Southern Asia 17,000 to 16,000 years ago. The “H1 megadrought” was one of the most severe climate trials ever faced by anatomically modern humans. Africa’s Lake Victoria dried out, the Nile and the Congo rivers shriveled, and Asian summer monsoons weakened or failed from China to the Mediterranean. While the cause of the drought is still unknown, the study opens up the possibility that the “Heinrich Event 1,” a massive surge of icebergs and meltwater into the North Atlantic at the close of the last ice age, could have played a role, as it coincided with the drought. This study differed from previous studies that implicated the southward drift of the tropical rain belt as a localized cause. Researchers found that the rain belt not only moved, but it also weakened. According to lead author Curt Stager, “there is much less ice left to collapse in the North Atlantic now, so it is unlikely that this type of megadrought could happen again, at least on such a huge scale.”</p>
<p align="center">For additional information see: <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/7d95c6c0f6" target="_blank">Science Daily</a>, <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/5c1c5c38c2" target="_blank">Study Abstract</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="461"><strong> </strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Arctic Algae Blooms Occurring Earlier, Impact on Carbon Cycling Unknown</strong></p>
<p align="left">On March 3, a study published in Global Change Biology found that warming temperatures and melting ice in the Arctic may be behind the phytoplankton peak occurring up to 50 days earlier than usual. Earlier timing of the annual algal bloom—a crucial marine event that leads to the production of zooplankton, which become a food resource for fish—could hold major consequences for the entire food web and carbon cycle in the region. Scientists plotted the yearly spring phytoplankton bloom in the Arctic and found that the peak of the bloom has been occurring earlier each year for more than 10 years. The researchers also analyzed satellite data depicting ocean color and phytoplankton production to determine how early the spring blooms have arrived in recent years. According to scientists, the advancement of the bloom may have serious consequences for the entire Arctic ecosystem, and could explain the annual variability of fish stocks in the region.</p>
<p align="center">For additional information see: <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/6396660fd3" target="_blank">Science Daily</a>, <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/e9b2b12e6d/systemMessage=Due+to+scheduled+maintenance%2C+access+to+Wiley+Online+Library+will+be+disrupted+on+Saturday%2C+5th+Mar+between+10%3A00-12%3A00+GMT" target="_blank">Study Abstract</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr style="text-align: center;">
<td width="461"><strong>Two Contrasting Stories on Climate Change and Biodiversity Loss<br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>One: Climate Change Could Make “Tree of Life” Slimmer in Europe</strong></p>
<p align="left">On March 1, EU-founded research published in the journal Nature found that the tree of life, an aggregate of species according to their genetic similarity, faces a trend of homogenization across the continent of Europe due to climate change. However, it will not lose its overall structure, meaning there will be no major losses of biodiversity, but it will become “thinner” as vulnerable species may fall prey to the effects of climate change. Major losses would occur only if localized “branches” were completely eliminated, which would then jeopardize the structure of the entire tree. According to researchers, reductions in phylogenetic diversity will be greater in southern Europe, and gains are expected in the higher latitudes or altitudes; however, losses will not be offset by gains. While the data did not present a number of species predicted to disappear, they did suggest that humankind needs to be aware of the threat and ensure species’ sustainability. This study differed from previous biodiversity studies through its use of phylogenetic groups, which are based entirely on species’ evolutionary relatedness to one another, as opposed to taxonomic groups, which provide information about evolutionary relatedness based on form and function, and are thus less accurate when predicting future evolutions.</p>
<p align="center">For additional information see: <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/0ac2f55bcf" target="_blank">Science 2.0</a>, <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/a07b70fe07/CALLER=EN_NEWS&amp;ACTION=D&amp;SESSION=&amp;RCN=33130" target="_blank">European Comission</a>, <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/aa659fb936" target="_blank">Study Abstract</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;" width="461"><strong><br />
Two: World’s Sixth Mass Extinction Could Already Be Underway </strong></p>
<p align="left">On March 2, a study published in the journal <em>Nature</em> suggested   that mankind may have set into motion the sixth known mass extinction in   Earth’s history.  Naturally induced extinction events have occurred   over the past 540 million years, but the new threat is man-made, caused   by habitat loss, over-fishing, over-hunting, the spread of germs and   viruses and introduced species, and climate change caused primarily by   the burning of fossil fuels.  Scientists examined the state of   biodiversity today, using the world’s mammal species as a measuring   baseline.  Until mankind’s expansion 500 years ago, mammal extinctions   were rather rare, with an average of two species dying out every million   years.  In the last 500 years, at least 80 out of 5,570 mammal species   have gone extinct.  Under the assumption that these species are extinct   and biodiversity loss will continue unabated, researchers said that the   sixth mass extinction could arrive within 3 to 22 centuries—a “fast   track” pace compared to previous extinctions.  Authors acknowledged some   weaknesses to their study from using only mammals as a benchmark of   Earth’s biodiversity, as well as having an incomplete fossil record.   However, they said it is important to devote resources and policy toward   species conservation.</p>
<p align="center">For additional information see: <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/0012ad6590/id=4371708" target="_blank">AFP</a>, <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/f504390655" target="_blank">Study Abstract</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p align="left"><strong><a name="1">Other Headlines</a></strong></p>
<div>
<ul>
<div>
<li><a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/532242319f/Title=N-C-Coastal-Resources-Commission-tones-down-sea-level-rise-policy&amp;tc=ar">N.C. Coastal Resources Commission Tones Down Sea-Level Rise Policy</a></li>
<li><a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/9bbe6efb97">Clean Fuel Worsens Climate Impacts for Some Vehicle Engines</a></li>
<li><a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/d6e88dab79">Dow to Invest $100 Million to Reduce Energy Use, GHG Emissions</a></li>
<li><a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/6b1b8d5850">Poll finds Climate Change an Issue in Canada </a></li>
<li><a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/2c2bb4da0d">Jordan: Report to Identify Greenhouse Gas Emitters</a></li>
<li><a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/8044678172">Severe Weather, Forecasting Could Prompt Force Majeure Rethink</a></li>
<li><a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/8cdc533c4d">Australia: Carbon Tax Would Hit Food, Warns Industry</a></li>
</div>
</ul>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;" width="461"><strong> <a name="2">March 9: The Canadian Boreal Forest Agreement: A New Model for Balancing Resource Use and Conservation</a><br />
</strong></p>
<p align="left">The Embassy of Canada, with the support of the Environmental and Energy Study Institute (EESI) is hosting a briefing on the Canadian Boreal Forest Agreement, one of the largest conservation agreements in history. The Agreement brings together the forest industry and conservation groups to work toward a common goal of economic prosperity and resource protection, and may be a useful model for managing environmental conflicts in other sectors. Speakers will include Gary Doer, Canadian ambassador to the United States; Avrim Lazar of the Forest Products Association of Canada; Greenpeace Forests Campaign Coordinator Richard Brooks; the Pew Environment Group’s Steven Kallick; and The Nature Conservancy’s Ronnie Drever. The briefing will be held from 10:00 – 11:30 am in G50 Dirksen Senate Office Building (Metro: Union Station). It is free and open to the public, no RSVP required. For more information, contact Claire Seaborn at <a href="mailto:claire.seaborn@international.gc.ca">claire.seaborn@international.gc.ca</a> or (202) 448-6452.</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;" width="461"><strong><a name="3">March 16: Natural Gas as a Transportation Fuel: Prospects and Challenges</a></strong></p>
<p align="left">The Environmental and Energy Study Institute (EESI) invites you to a briefing on the prospects for increased use of natural gas as a transportation fuel. Natural gas has a current price advantage over diesel fuel and gasoline (per gallon equivalent), emits fewer greenhouse gases when burned (per unit energy), and comes from mostly domestic sources at present. However, increasing and sustaining U.S. gas production will rely heavily on unconventional sources (shale gas, coal-bed methane, and tight gas), which face potentially rising costs, require continuous and intensive drilling, and present significant water supply, water quality, wastewater, air quality, land use, and seismic risk issues. Speakers for this event will include Danilo Santini of the Argonne National Laboratory, Mark Smith of the U.S. Department of Energy, Dana Aunkst from the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, Lynn Pittinger of Pittinger Consulting, and Steven Hamburg from the Environmental Defense Fund. This briefing will be held from 3:00 – 4:30 pm in 2318 Rayburn House Office Building (Metro: Capitol South). It is free and open to the public, no RSVP required. For more information, contact Jan Mueller at <a href="mailto:jmueller@eesi.org">jmueller@eesi.org</a>, or (202) 628-1400.</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr style="text-align: center;">
<td><strong>Writers: Laura Diez and Matthew Johnson</strong></p>
<p>Please distribute <em>Climate Change News</em> to your colleagues.    Permission for reproduction of this newsletter is granted provided that   the Environmental and Energy Study Institute is properly acknowledged as   the source.  Past issues are available <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/545aea27ed">here</a>.  Free email subscriptions are available <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/d7260dc1a7/m=1101500533487&amp;p=oi">here</a>.  We welcome your <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/f3e6290b86">suggestions, comments, and questions</a>.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;"><strong>The Environmental and Energy Study Institute (EESI) is a non-profit organization founded in 1984 by a bipartisan Congressional caucus dedicated to finding innovative environmental and energy solutions.  EESI works to protect the climate and ensure a healthy, secure, and sustainable future for America through policymaker education, coalition building, and policy development in the areas of energy efficiency, renewable energy, agriculture, forestry, transportation, buildings, and urban planning.</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/1be1d51035/aid=480"><img class="image image-_original" src="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/donate.jpg" alt="" width="90" height="39" /></a></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong><br />
EESI&#8217;s work, including this free newsletter, is made possible by financial support from people like you. Please help us continue to make it available by making a secure, online donation today by clicking <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/2aece12994/aid=480">here</a> or mailing a check to Environmental and Energy Study Institute; 1112 16th St NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20036. Please contact Susan Williams at (202) 662-1887<span class="skype_pnh_container" dir="ltr"><span class="skype_pnh_highlighting_inactive_common" title="Call this phone number in United States of America with Skype: +12026621887" dir="ltr"><span class="skype_pnh_textarea_span"><span class="skype_pnh_text_span"> (202) 662-1887</span></span><span class="skype_pnh_right_span"> or s</span></span></span>ee <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/776085826b">www.eesi.org/donate</a> to find out more. Thank you for your support!</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="lsidebar" style="background-color: #FFFFFF; 	padding: 10px;" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<hr />Climate Action Hotline is the new weekly update by the US Climate Action Network. <a class="lsidebar" style="background-color: #FFFFFF;" href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/6eaadb9843">Let us know what you think</a>.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
<td width="246" valign="top" bgcolor="#ebebeb">
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><img src="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/images/email/cah-member-blogs/" alt="Headlines" width="246" height="33" /></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="rsidebar" style="background-color:#EBEBEB;" valign="top">
<ul>
<li><a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/6749a3e397">China  Puts Forth Energy Intensity, Carbon Intensity and Total Energy Consumption  Targets in Twelfth Five Year Plan in Effort to Tackle &#8220;Unsustainable  Economic Growth&#8221;</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/10b50ac4f1/utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+compass-main+%28Compass+-+Main%29" target="_blank">Another  Crowd Packs EPA Carbon Pollution Session</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a title="Oil and Gas Lobbyists Claim The Sky is Falling" href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/a0d79a46b9" target="_blank">Oil and Gas Lobbyists  Claim the Sky is Falling</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/7b252546f2" target="_blank">Five  Year Plan Update: China Announces Total Energy Target</a></li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><img src="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/images/email/ca_email_headlines.jpg" alt="Headlines" width="246" height="33" /></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="rsidebar" style="background-color:#EBEBEB;" valign="top">
<ul>
<li><a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/94daa95075" target="_blank">Democrats Provide a Counteroffer to GOP Cuts on Energy and Climate</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/fd91d43413" target="_blank">Conflicts  Over Climate Issues Derail Senate EPA Budget Hearings</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li> <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/3b61588913" target="_blank">Ohio&#8217;s  Struggling Manufacturing Sector Finds Clean Energy Clientele</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li> <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/8882da1b68" target="_blank">Bill Passes Senate: Washington to be Coal-Free by 2025</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li> <a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/be3c785d61/track=rss" target="_blank">Coastal  Cities Prepare for Rising Sea Levels</a></li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="background-color:#EBEBEB;" valign="top"><img src="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/ca_email_international.jpg" alt="International Articles" width="246" height="33" /></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="rsidebar" style="background-color:#EBEBEB;" valign="top">
<ul>
<li><a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/0b800bf6ef" target="_blank">U.N.: Work on Climate Pacts to Start Next Month</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/88599e2725/pageNumber=1&amp;virtualBrandChannel=0" target="_blank">Energy  Companies Lobby EU for Deeper Carbon Cuts</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/b7af85ac14" target="_blank">Warmer  Oceans Taking Toll on World&#8217;s Coral Reefs</a></li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><img src="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/images/email/ca_email_coverage.jpg" alt="Special Coverage" width="246" height="33" /></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="rsidebar" style="background-color: #EBEBEB;padding: 10px;"><a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/fbb9a0cfe8/utm_content=mrisalvato%40climatenetwork.org&amp;utm_source=VerticalResponse&amp;utm_medium=Email&amp;utm_term=&amp;utm_campaign=Climate%20Action%20Hotline%2C%20Mar%2E%207"><img src="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/intlcalendar2011_blogsidebar.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="226" height="183" /></a><br />
<a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/d439fb9b2c/utm_content=mrisalvato%40climatenetwork.org&amp;utm_source=VerticalResponse&amp;utm_medium=Email&amp;utm_term=&amp;utm_campaign=Climate%20Action%20Hotline%2C%20Mar%2E%207"><img src="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/CAA_digesthotline.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="226" height="121" /></a><br />
<a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/b046d3b6f8/utm_content=mrisalvato%40climatenetwork.org&amp;utm_source=VerticalResponse&amp;utm_medium=Email&amp;utm_term=&amp;utm_campaign=Climate%20Action%20Hotline%2C%20Mar%2E%207"><img src="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/CAA_hotline.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="226" height="121" /></a><br />
<a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/bca7040ce0/utm_content=mrisalvato%40climatenetwork.org&amp;utm_source=VerticalResponse&amp;utm_medium=Email&amp;utm_term=&amp;utm_campaign=Climate%20Action%20Hotline%2C%20Mar%2E%207"><img src="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/images/email/cah_climateactionhotline.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="226" height="109" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/6f9207ca26/utm_content=mrisalvato%40climatenetwork.org&amp;utm_source=VerticalResponse&amp;utm_medium=Email&amp;utm_term=&amp;utm_campaign=Climate%20Action%20Hotline%2C%20Mar%2E%207"><img src="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/hotpubs_hotline.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="226" height="70" /></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><img src="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/images/email/ca_email_video.jpg" alt="Video Of The Week" width="246" height="33" /></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/6e9600388e/v=RHyJCoVf4UU&amp;feature=player_embedded"><img src="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/vidofweek-3711.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="246" height="200" /></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><img src="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/images/email/ca_email_quote.jpg" alt="Quote Of The Week" width="246" height="33" /></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="text" style="background-color: #EBEBEB;padding: 10px;" valign="top"><strong><em>“The clock is ticking. We must do whatever we can, wherever we can, as   quickly as we can, to protect the most vulnerable&#8230;We must also   continue to press for deeper emission cuts in line with what science is   telling us is necessary.” </em></strong></p>
<p>–  Ban Ki-Moon, U.N. Secretary-General</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><br style="clear: both;" /></p>
<hr />
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.usclimatenetwork.org%2Fhotline%2F2485%2F&amp;title=Imagine%20a%20World%20Where%20Politicians%20Get%20it%20About%20Climate%2C%20Climate%20Action%20Hotline%203.7.11" id="wpa2a_8"><img src="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p><p>Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hotline/climate-action-hotline-3-21-11/' rel='bookmark' title='Climate Action Hotline, 3.21.11'>Climate Action Hotline, 3.21.11</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hotline/ahead-of-the-election-signs-of-hope-and-caution-for-climate-activists-climate-action-hotline-10-26-10/' rel='bookmark' title='Ahead of the Election, Signs of Hope and Caution For Climate Activists, Climate Action Hotline 10.26.10'>Ahead of the Election, Signs of Hope and Caution For Climate Activists, Climate Action Hotline 10.26.10</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hotline/2263/' rel='bookmark' title='Climate Action Hotline, 11.29.10'>Climate Action Hotline, 11.29.10</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hotline/2485/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://cts.vresp.com/c/?USClimateActionNetwo/3a92b282bf/92282d322c/831f3a6a5c" length="514" type="video/x-ms-wvx" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Climategate Debunked: Climate Action Hotline, Apr. 16</title>
		<link>http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hotline/climategate-debunked-climate-action-hotline-apr-16/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hotline/climategate-debunked-climate-action-hotline-apr-16/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rhys Gerholdt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hotline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[c;imate action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate denier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Anglia University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hijacked emails]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/?p=1452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[April 16, 2010 Climate Research Unit, University of East Anglia Last year during the UN Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen, The Guardian newspaper’s respected environmental columnist, George Monbiot, described in painful and often hilarious detail the trail of missteps and communications blunders at East Anglia University that turned a deceitful email hack job into a [...]
Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hotline/climate-action-hotline-3-21-11/' rel='bookmark' title='Climate Action Hotline, 3.21.11'>Climate Action Hotline, 3.21.11</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hotline/2485/' rel='bookmark' title='Imagine a World Where Politicians Get it About Climate, Climate Action Hotline 3.7.11'>Imagine a World Where Politicians Get it About Climate, Climate Action Hotline 3.7.11</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hotline/picking-up-the-pieces-climate-action-hotline-apr-9/' rel='bookmark' title='Picking Up the Pieces: Climate Action Hotline, Apr. 9'>Picking Up the Pieces: Climate Action Hotline, Apr. 9</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="741" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="emailcontainer" style="border: 8px solid #2C6A9C;padding-top: 0px;padding-right: 0px;padding-bottom: 0px;padding-left: 0px;" width="757" valign="top">
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="741">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="emailheader" style="padding:0;" colspan="2"><a href="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/category/hotline/"><img src="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/images/email/ca_email_header.jpg" border="0" alt="US Climate Action Network" width="741" height="85" /></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="495" valign="top">
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="feature" style="padding:10px;text-align: left;background-color: #96C3DA;line-height: 16px;" valign="top">
<p style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12px;font-weight:bold;">April 16, 2010</p>
<table border="0" align="right">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><img src="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/cah_feature_4-16-20101.jpg" alt="" hspace="5" vspace="5" /></p>
<p><em><br />
<small>Climate Research Unit,</small></em></p>
<p><em><small> </small></em><em><small>University of East Anglia</small></em></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Last year during the UN Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen, <em>The Guardian</em> newspaper’s respected  environmental columnist, George Monbiot, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KrYIiFvucrQ">described in painful and often  hilarious detail</a> the trail of missteps and communications blunders at East  Anglia University that turned a deceitful email hack job into a focused attack  on the credibility of climate science.</p>
<p>This week, the findings of an independent investigation of the stolen  emails commissioned by the university were made public.  The authors of the university’s report,  relying on more diplomatic language, essentially confirmed Monbiot’s version: “We saw no  evidence of any deliberate scientific malpractice in any of the work of the  Climatic Research Unit and had it been there we believe that it is likely that  we would have detected it. Rather we found a small group of dedicated if  slightly disorganized researchers who were ill-prepared for being the focus of  public attention. As with many small research groups their internal procedures  were rather informal.”</p>
<p>Every independent analysis of the online hack job – by the <em>Associated  Press</em>, Pennsylvania State University, the Science and Technology Committee of  the British House of Commons – has reached essentially the same conclusion.  While there are concerns about how some scientists chose to communicate with  each other, there is nothing in the stolen emails that undermines the  scientific consensus that climate change is real and getting worse.</p>
<p>That, of course, won’t dissuade climate deniers and their allies in  Congress, the media, and free market think tanks from exploiting the American  media’s he said-she said meme to undermine public confidence in climate  science. But the consistent conclusions of the independent investigations  should bolster the work this year of heads of state, finance ministers, and  diplomats charged with ensuring the planet’s   environmental and economic security. It also will help Senate lawmakers,  who are set to introduce a climate and energy bill on April 26.</p>
<p>Next week in  Washington environment and finance ministers gather in separate meetings  at the very moment that the climate crisis and economic crisis have collided.  USCAN joined 24 other organizations, eight of them Canadian, in sending a  letter to President Barrack Obama and Prime Minister Stephen Harper to make  climate change a priority on the G-20 agenda in Toronto in June.</p>
<p>In the <a href="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/news-room/uscan-releases/groups-urge-toronto-g20-agenda-include-climate-action">letter to President Obama and Prime Minister Harper</a>,  groups from both nations assert that the steps needed to cool the planet and  make the transition to a low-carbon economy represent a clear formula for  solving the global economic recession.   The groups noted that during the G8 and G20 meetings last July in  L’Aquila and Pittsburgh, and in Copenhagen, world leaders committed to fight  climate change, phase out subsidies for fossil fuels and support innovative  mechanisms to generate climate finance for developing countries mitigation and  adaptation efforts.</p>
<p>There is no  dispute about the science of climate change or the consequences of the global  recession. Next week in Washington, world leaders have another chance to take  steps that reduce the risks of both.</p>
<p>Talk to you next week,  Keith Schneider</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="lsidebar" style="background-color: #FFFFFF; 	padding: 10px;" valign="top"><img src="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/images/email/ca_email_actionalert.gif" alt="Action Alert" width="475" height="32" /></p>
<p>This year marks the 40th anniversary of Earth Day, a day when 20  million Americans flooded the streets and demanded environmental accountability  from leaders in Washington. Today, we face mounting challenges posed by climate  change and our dependence on fossil fuels. We need solutions, but we cannot  move forward until Congress passes a comprehensive climate and clean energy  bill – one that will rebuild our economy, secure our energy independence, and  address the climate crisis.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://action.earthday.org/climaterally">Earth Day Climate Rally</a>, on April 25, is our  chance to be heard. In the spirit of the first Earth Day, please join USCAN as  we stand before Congress to demand strong climate legislation. <a href="http://action.earthday.org/climaterally">Make  your voice heard at the Climate Rally: The National Mall, Washington DC &#8211;  Sunday, April 25 from 11 a.m. to 7 p.m.</a></p>
<p>The Climate Rally will feature speeches by Dr. James Hansen, EPA  Administrator Lisa Jackson, James Cameron and many more. In  addition, Sting, John Legend, The Roots, Bob Weir, Patrick Stump, Mavis  Staples, Passion Pit, Q-Tip, Booker T and other musical acts will  perform. Visit <a title="blocked::earthday.org" href="http://www.earthday.org/">EarthDay.org</a> to learn more about the rally and ways to get involved around the country.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/images/email/ca_email_progress.gif" alt="Climate Progress" width="475" height="32" /></p>
<p><a class="actionheadline" href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20100415/ts_nm/us_climate_usa_congress" target="_blank">Senate Climate Bill to Be Unveiled April 26</a></p>
<p>A long-awaited compromise climate bill being drafted by Democratic Sen. John Kerry, Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham and independent Sen. Joseph Lieberman will be unveiled on April 26, sources said on Thursday.</p>
<p><a class="actionheadline" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/14/AR2010041404001.html%20">Panel Clears Scientists in &#8216;Climategate&#8217;</a></p>
<p>In the second of three investigations of so-called &#8220;climategate,&#8221; a panel of academic experts said Wednesday that  several prominent climate scientists did not engage in deliberate malpractice.</p>
<p><a class="actionheadline" href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5iVLhn0V2jy8xcWiAfWsSzZ5fxnBw">UN  climate talks wrap up after fresh rows</a></p>
<p>Three days of talks aimed at putting a new gloss on UN climate talks ended in  Bonn late Sunday after new textual trench warfare less than four months after a  stormy summit in Copenhagen. The Bonn talks exposed a rift between developed  and developing countries over whether to pursue or quietly bury the Copenhagen  Accord.</p>
<p><a class="actionheadline" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/13/AR2010041303673.html">Some Republicans Say Open to Climate Bill </a></p>
<p>Some prominent Republican senators expressed openness on Tuesday to a U.S. climate bill in the Senate that  would need bipartisan support to advance.</p>
<p><a class="actionheadline" href="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/climate-negotiations/us-copenhagen-accord-not-a-casual-agreement-cuts-detractors-funding/">US:  Copenhagen Accord Not A ‘Casual Agreement,’ Cuts Detractors’ Funding</a></p>
<p>In Bonn U.S. negotiators called on parties to capitalize on the  progress marked by the Accord and urged the world not to consider it a “casual  agreement.” As if to underscore their point, the Washington  Post reports that two countries that have rejected the Copenhagen Accord,  Ecuador and Bolivia, were stripped of U.S. funding  to help cope with the consequences of climate change.</p>
<p><a class="actionheadline" href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20100412/sc_afp/boliviaclimate">7,500 Due for  Alternate Climate Conference in Bolivia</a></p>
<p>The alternative &#8220;people&#8217;s conference&#8221; on climate change (Apr 20-22)  called by socialist Bolivian President Evo Morales is expecting 7,500 delegates  from more than 100 countries, officials said.</p>
<p><a class="actionheadline" href="http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=tnVz&amp;usg=AFQjCNHyp2DxHeyAHM0GEy1SPaF4FMnOPg&amp;sig2=CkEm5JmaTc5_nXvOx6hXoA&amp;cid=17593739895041&amp;ei=bkrHS8D_FJydlQevzOihAw&amp;rt=SEARCH&amp;vm=STANDARD&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Fhostednews%2Fafp%2Farticle%2FALeqM5imqwJTryly3to_1O2VX_bK7GBIHg%3e&amp;ct2=us%2F0_0_s_2_0_t&amp;ct3=MAA4AEgCUABqAnVz&amp;usg=AFQjCNHyp2DxHeyAHM0GEy1SPaF4FMnOPg&amp;sig2=CkEm5JmaTc5_nXvOx6hXoA&amp;cid=17593739895041&amp;ei=bkrHS8D_FJydlQevzOihAw&amp;rt=SEARCH&amp;vm=STANDARD&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Fhostednews%2Fafp%2Farticle%2FALeqM5imqwJTryly3to_1O2VX_bK7GBIHg%20">Obama Says China Can&#8217;t &#8216;Wait&#8217; on Climate Change</a></p>
<p>US President Barack Obama on Thursday said China can&#8217;t be allowed to wait until  its standard of living improves before tackling climate change. Obama said that  &#8220;emerging countries not just China but also India, Brazil and others are</p>
<p>pursuing a path in which they replace us as the largest carbon emitters, that&#8217;s  not a sustainable practical approach.&#8221;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="lsidebar" style="background-color: #FFFFFF; 	padding: 10px;" valign="top">
<hr />Climate Action Hotline is the new weekly update by the US Climate Action Network. <a class="lsidebar" style="background-color: #FFFFFF;" href="http://bit.ly/climateactionfeedback">Let us know what you think</a>.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
<td width="246" valign="top" bgcolor="#EBEBEB">
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><img src="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/images/email/ca_email_coverage.jpg" alt="Special Coverage" width="246" height="33" /></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="rsidebar" style="background-color: #EBEBEB;padding: 10px;">
<div>
<p><a href="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/"><img src="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/images/email/cah_climateactionhotline.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="226" height="109" /></a><a href="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/hot-topics/climate-polling"></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/hot-topics/climate-polling"> </a><a href="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/hot-topics/climate-polling"><img src="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/polling_cah_sidebar.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="225" height="88" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/category/hot-pubs/"><img src="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/hotpubs_hotline.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="226" height="70" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/policy/dirty-air-act-amendment"><img src="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/cah_banner_stopdirtyairact.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="226" height="250" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/policy/congress-1/climate-and-clean-energy-action-state-by-state"><img src="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/images/email/ca_email_state.gif" border="0" alt="" width="226" height="74" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/energyrebellion"></a></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><img src="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/images/email/ca_email_video.jpg" alt="Video Of The Week" width="246" height="33" /></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ihQv4lu5gIc&amp;feature=player_embedded"><img src="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/cah_video_4-13-2010.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="246" height="200" /></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><img src="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/images/email/ca_email_quote.jpg" alt="Quote Of The Week" width="246" height="33" /></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="quote" style="background-color: #EBEBEB;padding: 10px;" valign="top"><a href="http://www.ctmirror.org/story/5479/lieberman-climate-change-political-and-otherwise"><img style="border: 2px solid #FFFFFF;padding: 0px;margin-left: 5px;margin-top: 3px;" src="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/cah_quote_lieberman_4-13-2010.jpg" alt="" width="94" height="84" align="right" /></a>&#8220;. . . I think we have a real shot at [climate legislation]. To me, it will be one of the most significant things I ever have done. .&#8221;</p>
<p>-<em>Joe Lieberman</em></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><img src="http://www.usclimatenetwork.org/images/email/ca_email_headlines.jpg" alt="Headlines" width="246" height="33" /></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="rsidebar" style="background-color:#EBEBEB;" valign="top">
<ul style="list-style-type: square;">
<li> <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE63B69Y20100412?feedType=RSS&amp;feedName=environmentNews&amp;utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+reuters%2Fenvironment+%28News+%2F+US+%2F+Environment%29">Glacier breaks in Peru,  causing tsunami in Andes</a></li>
<li> <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2010/apr/12/shell-oil-sands-shareholders-review-campaign">Shell  fights shareholders&#8217; campaign for oil sands review</a></li>
<li> <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601100&amp;sid=a8OAcoxZWtwI">EU Climate  Plan Is Achievable, Can Cut Energy Bills</a></li>
<li> <a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/idUKTRE63A01720100413">Chinese coal ship  refloated from Australian reef</a></li>
<li> <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/apr/09/ecocide-crime-genocide-un-environmental-damage">British  campaigner urges UN to accept &#8216;ecocide&#8217; as international crime</a></li>
<li> <a href="http://content.usatoday.com/communities/greenhouse/post/2010/04/is-climate-change-a-moral-issue-what-would-god-say/1">Is  climate change a moral issue? What would God say?</a></li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.usclimatenetwork.org%2Fhotline%2Fclimategate-debunked-climate-action-hotline-apr-16%2F&amp;title=Climategate%20Debunked%3A%20Climate%20Action%20Hotline%2C%20Apr.%2016" id="wpa2a_10"><img src="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p><p>Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hotline/climate-action-hotline-3-21-11/' rel='bookmark' title='Climate Action Hotline, 3.21.11'>Climate Action Hotline, 3.21.11</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hotline/2485/' rel='bookmark' title='Imagine a World Where Politicians Get it About Climate, Climate Action Hotline 3.7.11'>Imagine a World Where Politicians Get it About Climate, Climate Action Hotline 3.7.11</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hotline/picking-up-the-pieces-climate-action-hotline-apr-9/' rel='bookmark' title='Picking Up the Pieces: Climate Action Hotline, Apr. 9'>Picking Up the Pieces: Climate Action Hotline, Apr. 9</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hotline/climategate-debunked-climate-action-hotline-apr-16/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Koch Industries Finances Climate Denier Factions</title>
		<link>http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/climate-deniers/koch-industries-finances-climate-denier-factions/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/climate-deniers/koch-industries-finances-climate-denier-factions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 00:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith Schneider</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Deniers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate denial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate denier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenpeace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heartland Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keith Schneider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Koch Industries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mackinac Center for Public Policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/?p=1334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The work to achieve a climate and energy bill in the United States is moving with considerably slower momentum this spring than it did at the same time last year. A number of factors contribute, not the least of which is the time and focus that the White House and Democrats in Congress devoted to [...]
Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/uncategorized/senator-murkowski-is-in-trouble-more-intel-on-the-koch-brothers/' rel='bookmark' title='Senator Murkowski Is In Trouble; More Intel on the Koch Brothers'>Senator Murkowski Is In Trouble; More Intel on the Koch Brothers</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hotline/senator-murkowski-is-in-trouble-more-intel-on-the-koch-brothers-climate-action-hotline-8-27-10/' rel='bookmark' title='Senator Murkowski Is In Trouble; More Intel on the Koch Brothers, Climate Action Hotline 8.27.10'>Senator Murkowski Is In Trouble; More Intel on the Koch Brothers, Climate Action Hotline 8.27.10</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/campaigns/global-warming-and-energy/polluterwatch/koch-industries"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1336" title="koch-report-cover-250px" src="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/koch-report-cover-250px.jpg" alt="koch-report-cover-250px" width="250" height="324" /></a><br />
The work to achieve a climate and energy bill in the United States is moving with considerably slower momentum this spring than it did at the same time last year. A number of factors contribute, not the least of which is the time and focus that the White House and Democrats in Congress devoted to enacting a national health care bill, which passed earlier this month.  Another factor is the flagging U.S. economy and the meager appetite that many voters and lawmakers have for big new domestic initiatives, like the proposed climate and clean energy bill.</p>
<p>Still, the wearying health debate and the Great Recession do not fully explain the uphill struggle of climate activism. Another factor is at work. After years of swinging away at the climate action community’s formidable message of urgency and useful solutions, the fossil fuel industry’s rhetorical axes nearly four months ago found a soft spot in the scientific details of climate change.</p>
<p>The climate action community&#8217;s response has been double-barrelled. In December when the <a href="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/climate-negotiations/responding-to-a-scientific-hack-job-that-wont-cripple-climate-talks/">email conversations of climate scientists were stolen from East Anglia University, climate activists </a>made a good case that nothing said between researchers damaged the foundations of the global consensus on the causes of climate change, its urgent consequences, and the opportunity for solutions that generated new industries and new jobs.</p>
<p>The second response has been to penetrate and uncover the full range, influence, structure, and interlocking relationships of the fossil fuel political infrastructure, which is actively involved in fostering the campaign of scientific deceit. The results of that work have emerged in the last couple of weeks.</p>
<p>Last week Greenpeace International published <a href="http://www.greenpeace.org/international/press/reports/dealing-in-doubt">&#8220;Dealing in Doubt: The Climate Denial Industry and Climate Science,</a>&#8221; which documented the 20-year campaign led by ExxonMobil to exploit the space the mainstream media opened with its &#8220;let&#8217;s hear from the other side&#8221; principle of reporting.  Meanwhile in Europe, Danish newspapers picked up the story initially flagged by Pete Altman, a climate specialist and blogger at NRDC, who reported that  a Danish study critical of Danish wind energy was financed by an American activist think tank with financial ties to oil-rich Koch Industries.</p>
<p>This week Greenpeace advanced the story enormously with its new report, <a href="http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/campaigns/global-warming-and-energy/polluterwatch/koch-industries">&#8220;Koch Industries: Secretly Funding The Climate Denial Machine.&#8221;</a> The report makes clear that Koch Industries is, and has been for over a decade, a stalwart institution, financier, and strategic adviser for the fossil fuel industry&#8217;s political infrastructure aimed at one outcome: Blocking the advent of the low-carbon 21<sup>st</sup> century economy and wrapping its arms as snugly as it can around the 20<sup>th</sup> century drive-through, energy wasting, coal-gas-oil-fueled American way of life.</p>
<p>The Greenpeace report also describes how Koch Industries, with revenues of $100 billion annually, 70,000 employees, and operations in 60 countries can execute this goal with a shockingly low investment. The report identifies over 40 climate denial organizations that Koch funded from 1997 to 2008 for $50 million, roughly half of that from 2005 to 2008. In addition, Koch Industries spent less than $6 million since 2004 on the campaigns of federal lawmakers, almost all Republicans, and $37.9 million from 2006 to 2009 for direct lobbying.</p>
<p>In other words for an investment of less than $10 million annually in the lawmakers, lobbyists, activist think tanks, communications shops, and other facets of the political infrastructure, Koch Industries has assured the rising revenues and profitability of its core climate changing businesses.</p>
<p>Koch and its sister companies in the fossil fuel industry are so wealthy they can devote a tiny portion of their total revenue – a fraction of a fraction of 1 percent – to finance an influential inter-connected political infrastructure at the state level and in Washington.</p>
<p>The extent and expanse of that investment reveals the tight coordination that the fossil fuel industry deploys in executing its progress-denying work. Along with some of the usual suspects expected to receive Koch money &#8212; American Enterprise Institute, Cato, Heritage, Reason &#8212; the company also finances some of the active and influential state-based groups committed to &#8220;sound&#8221; science that is anything but.</p>
<p>The Mackinac Center for Public Policy in Michigan, for instance, whose staff includes a former libertarian anti-science state director of the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality now dedicated to clouding the science of climate in Lansing, the state capital. And the Heartland Institute in Chicago, a free market &#8220;think&#8221; tank that isn&#8217;t doing much thinking about climate action that right thinking people would generally consider valuable.</p>
<p>More on this and other investigations as we move forward.</p>
<p>&#8211; Keith Schneider</p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 10.0px Helvetica; color: #343c42;">
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.usclimatenetwork.org%2Fclimate-deniers%2Fkoch-industries-finances-climate-denier-factions%2F&amp;title=Koch%20Industries%20Finances%20Climate%20Denier%20Factions" id="wpa2a_12"><img src="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p><p>Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/uncategorized/senator-murkowski-is-in-trouble-more-intel-on-the-koch-brothers/' rel='bookmark' title='Senator Murkowski Is In Trouble; More Intel on the Koch Brothers'>Senator Murkowski Is In Trouble; More Intel on the Koch Brothers</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/hotline/senator-murkowski-is-in-trouble-more-intel-on-the-koch-brothers-climate-action-hotline-8-27-10/' rel='bookmark' title='Senator Murkowski Is In Trouble; More Intel on the Koch Brothers, Climate Action Hotline 8.27.10'>Senator Murkowski Is In Trouble; More Intel on the Koch Brothers, Climate Action Hotline 8.27.10</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/climate-deniers/koch-industries-finances-climate-denier-factions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fossil Fuel Lobby Focused on Disrupting Copenhagen</title>
		<link>http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/energy-rebellion/fossil-fuel-lobby-focused-on-disrupting-copenhagen/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/energy-rebellion/fossil-fuel-lobby-focused-on-disrupting-copenhagen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Suzanne Bopp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy Rebellion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate denier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copenhagen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inhofe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/?p=238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The fossil fuel lobby is hard at work around the world to prevent any global climate treaty from coming out of Copenhagen in December, according to a report released by the Center for Public Integrity. According to the report, “Global attempts to craft a pivotal new climate treaty in Copenhagen this December are being stymied [...]
Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/energy-rebellion/more-evidence-that-opposition-to-clean-energy-reform-is-funded-by-fossil-fuel-companies/' rel='bookmark' title='More Evidence that Opposition to Clean Energy Reform Is Funded by Fossil Fuel Companies'>More Evidence that Opposition to Clean Energy Reform Is Funded by Fossil Fuel Companies</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/energy-rebellion/coal-lobby-%e2%80%9cdishonors%e2%80%9d-veterans-day-say-veterans/' rel='bookmark' title='Coal Lobby “Dishonors” Veterans Day, Say Veterans'>Coal Lobby “Dishonors” Veterans Day, Say Veterans</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/video/fossil-of-the-day-canadas-contemporary-baseline/' rel='bookmark' title='Fossil of the Day: Canada&#8217;s Contemporary Baseline'>Fossil of the Day: Canada&#8217;s Contemporary Baseline</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fossil fuel lobby is hard at work around the world to prevent any global climate treaty from coming out of Copenhagen in December, according to a report released by the <a href="http://www.publicintegrity.org/investigations/global_climate_change_lobby/">Center for Public Integrity</a>. <img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-239" title="conesville" src="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/conesville-150x150.jpg" alt="conesville" width="150" height="150" /></p>
<p>According to the report, “Global attempts to craft a pivotal new climate treaty in Copenhagen this December are being stymied by a far-reaching, multinational backlash led by fossil fuel industries and other heavy carbon emitters, according to an eight-country report by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists.”</p>
<p>From the coal industry in Appalachia to aluminum interests in Australia, industry advocates are ready to protest that changes made to protect the environment will destroy jobs and discourage investment. “Wherever nations have taken the first modest steps to stave off a looming environmental calamity for future generations, they’ve triggered a backlash from powers rooted in the economy of the past. Opponents of climate action may have different methods as they pressure different capitals, but the message is consistent: Be afraid that a cherished way of life may be lost. Be afraid that a better standard of living will never be had,” the report says.</p>
<p>In the US, the lobbyists are out in force working against the climate legislation making its way through Congress. “… more than 1,150 companies and advocacy groups are very tuned in, and they have deployed about 2,810 climate lobbyists to Capitol Hill, an increase of more than 400 percent from six years earlier, according to an <a href="http://www.publicintegrity.org/investigations/climate_change/articles/entry/1608/">analysis of disclosures</a> filed with the Senate Office of Public Records. Spending on the lobbying this year so far in the United States is at least $47 million,” according to the report.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.usclimatenetwork.org%2Fenergy-rebellion%2Ffossil-fuel-lobby-focused-on-disrupting-copenhagen%2F&amp;title=Fossil%20Fuel%20Lobby%20Focused%20on%20Disrupting%20Copenhagen" id="wpa2a_14"><img src="http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share"/></a></p><p>Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/energy-rebellion/more-evidence-that-opposition-to-clean-energy-reform-is-funded-by-fossil-fuel-companies/' rel='bookmark' title='More Evidence that Opposition to Clean Energy Reform Is Funded by Fossil Fuel Companies'>More Evidence that Opposition to Clean Energy Reform Is Funded by Fossil Fuel Companies</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/energy-rebellion/coal-lobby-%e2%80%9cdishonors%e2%80%9d-veterans-day-say-veterans/' rel='bookmark' title='Coal Lobby “Dishonors” Veterans Day, Say Veterans'>Coal Lobby “Dishonors” Veterans Day, Say Veterans</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/video/fossil-of-the-day-canadas-contemporary-baseline/' rel='bookmark' title='Fossil of the Day: Canada&#8217;s Contemporary Baseline'>Fossil of the Day: Canada&#8217;s Contemporary Baseline</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.usclimatenetwork.org/energy-rebellion/fossil-fuel-lobby-focused-on-disrupting-copenhagen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

